#71
27.02.2026, 16:14
| Folgender Benutzer sagt Danke zu applechess für den nützlichen Beitrag: | ||
kamoj (27.02.2026) | ||
#72
27.02.2026, 21:41
|
|||||||||||
|
AW: Match 120'/40, Excel Mach III vs Mephisto MM V HG 550
Hello,
I had CARA (v2.5.10) analyze the 50 games, using SF18 set to 10 secs/move. The outcomes are rather compliant to Kurt's conclusions. Here are both players statistics: Code:
Player Statistics: Excel Mach III ================================= Overview ------- Total Games: 50 Win Rate: 38.0% Record: 19-14-17 Average Accuracy: 90.1% Estimated Elo: 2035 Average CPL: 33.2 Top 3 Move %: 77.4% Move Accuracy ------------- Book Move: 12.9% Brilliant: 0.4% Best Move: 41.4% Good Move: 29.7% Inaccuracy: 7.4% Mistake: 4.3% Miss: 0.5% Blunder: 3.4% Performance by Phase ------------------- Phase Avg CPL Opening 17.3 Middlegame 32.5 Endgame 39.0 Openings -------- Most Played: E98 (King's Indian: Mar del Plata, 9.Ne1 Nd7 10.Nd3 f5 11.Bd2 Kh8): (1 games) E59 (Nimzo-Indian: Main Line, 9.bxc3 dxc4 10.Bxc4 Qc7 11.Ba2 e5): (1 games) A39 (English: Symmetrical, Main Line 7.d4, 10.Qd3 a6): (1 games) Worst Accuracy: A04 (English Opening - Symmetrical Variation): Avg CPL 83.9 (1 games) C43 (Petrov's Defense: Modern Attack, Trifunovic Variation): Avg CPL 75.0 (1 games) D67 (Queen's Gambit Declined: Orthodox Defense, Bd3 Line): Avg CPL 51.0 (1 games) Best Accuracy: E59 (Nimzo-Indian: Main Line, 9.bxc3 dxc4 10.Bxc4 Qc7 11.Ba2 e5): Avg CPL 0.0 (1 games) D59 (Queen's Gambit Declined: Tartakower Defense): Avg CPL 0.0 (1 games) B76 (Sicilian: Dragon, Yugoslav, 9.O-O-O d5: 12.Bd4 e5): Avg CPL 0.0 (1 games) Error Patterns -------------- Frequent blunders in endgame (74.8% of blunders) Frequency: 83 (74.8%) Struggles to convert winning positions (18 games) Frequency: 18 (36.0%) Player Statistics: Mephisto MM V HG 550 ======================================= Overview ------- Total Games: 50 Win Rate: 34.0% Record: 17-14-19 Average Accuracy: 90.0% Estimated Elo: 2012 Average CPL: 37.3 Top 3 Move %: 75.9% Move Accuracy ------------- Book Move: 12.4% Brilliant: 0.3% Best Move: 42.6% Good Move: 28.6% Inaccuracy: 7.2% Mistake: 4.6% Miss: 1.5% Blunder: 2.7% Performance by Phase ------------------- Phase Avg CPL Opening 21.7 Middlegame 33.5 Endgame 39.8 Openings -------- Most Played: E98 (King's Indian: Mar del Plata, 9.Ne1 Nd7 10.Nd3 f5 11.Bd2 Kh8): (1 games) E59 (Nimzo-Indian: Main Line, 9.bxc3 dxc4 10.Bxc4 Qc7 11.Ba2 e5): (1 games) A39 (English: Symmetrical, Main Line 7.d4, 10.Qd3 a6): (1 games) Worst Accuracy: B92 (Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation, Traditional Line): Avg CPL 164.0 (1 games) D29 (QGA: Classical, 8...Bb7 9.Rd1 Nbd7): Avg CPL 99.0 (1 games) A04 (English Opening - Symmetrical Variation): Avg CPL 79.0 (1 games) Best Accuracy: E59 (Nimzo-Indian: Main Line, 9.bxc3 dxc4 10.Bxc4 Qc7 11.Ba2 e5): Avg CPL 0.0 (1 games) A39 (English: Symmetrical, Main Line 7.d4, 10.Qd3 a6): Avg CPL 0.0 (1 games) D59 (Queen's Gambit Declined: Tartakower Defense): Avg CPL 0.0 (1 games) Error Patterns -------------- Frequent blunders in endgame (74.7% of blunders) Frequency: 71 (74.7%) Struggles to convert winning positions (17 games) Frequency: 17 (34.0%) Code:
brilliancies:
game 5 MM V white 25.Qxf5 - best move, yet 25.Qg5+ looked better 25...Kh8 26.Qf6+ Kg8 27.Bxc4
game 8 MIII white 17.Nxf6+ - best move, yet 17.Nf3 looked better 17...Nxd5 18.Rxd5
game 10 MIII white 31.Ba5 - best move, yet 31.Ng4 looked better 31...dxe4 32.Nxe5 Kf8 33.Nxc6 Rxc6 34.Bxb5
game 15 MM V white 43.Rc2 Rook sacrifice prevents black mate threat: Nc3 followed by Ne4
game 17 MM V white x2 37.Rxh6+ - best move, yet 37.Ncd5+ looked better 37...Rxd5 38.Rxh6 Ke7 39. Nxd5+ Kd7
& 39.Rg5+ - best move, yet 39.Rc6+ looked better 39...Kg7 40.Rxc5 Kxh6 41.Rxc8
game 18 MIII white 38.Bxg5 - best move, yet 38.hxg5 looked better 38...Qh2+ 39.Kg4 Qxg2+ 40.Rg3 Qe2+ 41.Kf5
game 20 MM V black 51...c5+ - best move, yet 51...Kf5 looked better 52.Kd3 Nh2 53.Kc3 Ng4 or 51...Kf3 52.c5 Ke2 53.cxb6 axb6
game 21 MIII black 49...Bd4 - best move, yet 49...Kh7 looked better 50.Qb4 Rxa6 51.Qb1+ g6
game 26 MIII white 50.Rxh6 - best move, yet 50.Rb6 looked better 50...Nd3 51.Rxb3 Ke4 52.Rb7
game 31 MIII black 40...Nc6 - best move, yet 40...e4 looked better 41.Qc5+ Kb7 42.Bxe4+ Nc6 43.Qxf2
game 32 MM V black 44...Qxb8 - best move, yet 44...Qa1+ looked better 45.Rb1 Qa3+ 46.Qb2 Qe3+ 47.Kd1 Qxe4
game 35 MIII black 26...Qc5+ - best move, yet 26...h5 looked better 27.Nh6+ Kh7 or 27.Bf4 Nxf4 28.Nh6+ Kh7 29.Qxf4 Re4
game 37 MIII black 47...Nxd4 - best move, yet 47...Bg6 looked better 48.Rxf4 gxf4 49.Rxc6 a5 50.Rc7+ Kh6
game 44 MIII white x2 51.Be8 - best move, yet 51.Rh5+ looked better 51.gxh5 52.Bf5+ g6 53.Qxg6+ Kh8
& 53.Bxg6 - best move, yet 53.Qxe2 looked better 53...Kh7 54.f5 gxf5 55.Qh5+ Kg8 56.Qxf5
game 45 MM V white 45.h5 - best move, yet 45.b6 looked better 45...d4+ 46.Kb3 Rf1 47.Kb2 d3 48.b7
game 46 MM V black 25...Bb5 - best move, yet 25...Bxb3 looked better 26.Be7 Rb8 27.Bh3
game 47 MIII black 39...g6 - best move, yet 39...f5 looked better 40.Bc6 Rc7 41.g4 fxg4 or 40.Bxf5 Rc7 41.Ne4 Bc2
I am rather happy with the ELO estimates based on 50 games, they are pretty spot on. MfG, Eric 
|
| Folgende 5 Benutzer sagen Danke zu Tibono für den nützlichen Beitrag: | ||
applechess (27.02.2026), Egbert (28.02.2026), Roberto (28.02.2026), spacious_mind (27.02.2026), Thomas J (28.02.2026) | ||
#73
27.02.2026, 22:26
|
||||||||||||
|
AW: Match 120'/40, Excel Mach III vs Mephisto MM V HG 550
 Zitat von Tibono
Hello,
I had CARA (v2.5.10) analyze the 50 games, using SF18 set to 10 secs/move. The outcomes are rather compliant to Kurt's conclusions. I am rather happy with the ELO estimates based on 50 games, they are pretty spot on. MfG, Eric Many thanks for your info. Is CARA the best tool for analysing chess games? And where can I download it? Kind regards Kurt
|
#74
28.02.2026, 13:26
|
|||||||||||
|
AW: Match 120'/40, Excel Mach III vs Mephisto MM V HG 550
Hello Kurt,
to my opinion yes, it is current best for what it is made for: analyzing chess games. Free and very professional in its design and features. Home page on Github.io There are Manual pages and videos from the author at bottom of the above page; and a YouTube review by Nathan Rose . More than worth a try! MfG, Eric
|
| Folgender Benutzer sagt Danke zu Tibono für den nützlichen Beitrag: | ||
applechess (28.02.2026) | ||
#75
28.02.2026, 17:18
|
||||||||||||
|
AW: Match 120'/40, Excel Mach III vs Mephisto MM V HG 550
Zitat von Tibono
Hello Kurt,
to my opinion yes, it is current best for what it is made for: analyzing chess games. Free and very professional in its design and features. https://pguntermann.github.io/CARA/"]Home page on Github.io There are Manual pages and videos from the author at bottom of the above page; and a YouTube review by Nathan Rose https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4gXfJs_poA"]here. More than worth a try! MfG, Eric Thank you for your reply. I will gladly give the CARA analysis tool a try. Kind regards Kurt
|
| Folgender Benutzer sagt Danke zu applechess für den nützlichen Beitrag: | ||
Tibono (28.02.2026) | ||
#76
01.03.2026, 19:47
|
||||||||||||
|
AW: Match 120'/40, Excel Mach III vs Mephisto MM V HG 550
Zitat von Tibono
Hello,
I had CARA (v2.5.10) analyze the 50 games, using SF18 set to 10 secs/move. The outcomes are rather compliant to Kurt's conclusions. Should you be interested in the list of brilliant moves that CARA reported, here they are, with some additional comments: [CODE]brilliancies: game 5 MM V white 25.Qxf5 - best move, yet 25.Qg5+ looked better 25...Kh8 26.Qf6+ Kg8 27.Bxc4 game 8 MIII white 17.Nxf6+ - best move, yet 17.Nf3 looked better 17...Nxd5 18.Rxd5 game 10 MIII white 31.Ba5 - best move, yet 31.Ng4 looked better 31...dxe4 32.Nxe5 Kf8 33.Nxc6 Rxc6 34.Bxb 1. = (0.00) (50% +0% =100% -0%): 25.Dg5 Kh8 26.Df6 Kg8 27.Dxf5 Dc7 28.Dg5 Kh8 29.Dh6 Kg8 30.Le4 Txe4 31.Dg5 Kh8 32.Df6 Kg8 33.Dg5 2. = (0.00) (50% +0% =100% -0%): 25.Dxf5 Dc7 26.Dg5 Kh8 27.Dh6 Kg8 Die Stellung ist ausgeglichen game 8 MIII (Kurt: why MIII??) white 17.Nxf6+ - best move, yet 17.Nf3 looked better 17...Nxd5 18.Rxd5[/quote] Analysis by Stockfish 18: (Tiefe 33/58) 1. +- (5.21) (100% +100% =0% -0%): 17.Sxf6 Kf7 18.Sh5 Te8 19.Sf3 Lf6 20.Dc2 Kg8 21.Dxf5 De7 22.Te1 Df7 23.Txe8 Dxe8 24.Sxf6 Sxf6 25.Dxc5 Ta8 26.Le5 Tc8 27.Da3 Sd5 28.Td1 De6 29.Db3 Tc4 30.Dd3 h6 31.h4 Sf4 32.Lxf4 Txf4 33.Te1 Dc6 34.Se5 Db6 35.Dd5 Kh7 2. +- (3.81) (100% +100% =0% -0%): 17.Sf3 Se4 18.a4 b4 19.Sd2 0-0 20.Sxe7 Dxe7 21.f3 h6 22.fxe4 fxe4 23.Lg3 Sf6 24.Sc4 Te8 25.Sd6 Tf8 26.Dc4 Kh8 27.Sf5 Df7 28.Dxc5 Td7 29.Se3 Td3 30.Txd3 exd3 31.Dd4 Dd7 32.Dxd7 Sxd7 33.Tc1 17.Sxf6 Weiss steht klar auf Gewinn I am rather happy with the ELO estimates based on 50 games, they are pretty spot on. MfG, Eric[/QUOTE] Hi Eric Based on my initial game analysis with CARA, I get the impression that an analysis time of 10 seconds per move is not sufficient to achieve satisfactory results. This may be due to the fact that I have not yet used all the finer parameters for the settings in CARA. However, I then took the example given for two positions and compared it with Stockfish 18 at higher search depths. And here, at least, the conclusions drawn are not convincing because the difference in evaluation are very small and may be neglected. I will continue my research. Game 10 is another example: 92317: Excel Mach III - Mephisto MM V HG 550 ½-½ 10, Match 08__120'/40 2016 6k1/4bpp1/1rb2n1p/1pnpp3/1B2P3/NPP2P1P/4B1PN/3R2K1 w - - 0 1 Analysis by Stockfish 18: (Depth 53) 1. = (-0.10) (50% +0% =100% -0%): 31.La5 Tb7 32.Sg4 dxe4 33.Sxe5 exf3 34.Lxf3 Lxf3 35.Sxf3 Sfe4 36.Lb4 Sxc3 37.Lxc3 b4 38.Lb2 bxa3 39.Lxa3 Txb3 40.Lxc5 Lxc5 41.Kf1 g6 42.Se5 Le7 43.Td3 Tb1 44.Ke2 Tb5 45.Sf3 Ta5 46.g3 h5 47.Kf1 Kf8 48.Kg2 Lb4 49.Td4 Ta2 50.Kh1 Lc5 51.Td7 Ke8 52.Td2 Ta3 53.Kg2 f6 54.g4 hxg4 55.hxg4 Le3 56.Te2 Kf7 57.Sd2 Td3 2. = (-0.18) (50% +0% =100% -1%): 31.Sg4 Sxg4 32.hxg4 dxe4 33.Kf1 exf3 34.Lxf3 e4 35.Le2 Tb7 36.Lxc5 Lxc5 37.Td8 Lf8 38.c4 g6 39.cxb5 Ld7 40.Sb1 Lxb5 41.Lxb5 Txb5 42.Sc3 Txb3 43.Sxe4 Tb4 44.Sf6 Kg7 45.Se8 Kh8 46.Tc8 Txg4 47.Kg1 h5 48.Sf6 Td4 49.Sxh5 Kg8 50.Sg3 Kg7 51.Kf2 Le7 52.Sf1 Lf6 53.Se3 Tf4 54.Kg3 Ta4 55.Tc4 Ta3 56.Kf2 Le5 57.Tb4 Die Stellung ist ausgeglichen. Kind regards Kurt Geändert von applechess (Gestern um 14:57 Uhr)
|
 |
Linear-Darstellung
|
|
Ähnliche Themen
|
||||
| Thema | Erstellt von | Forum | Antworten | Letzter Beitrag |
| Turnier: Fidelity Excel Mach III vs Mephisto Glasgow Phoenix | applechess | Partien und Turniere / Games and Tournaments | 20 | 27.03.2024 20:48 |
| Turnier: Mephisto Polgar sel.5 - Fidelity Excel Mach III | applechess | Partien und Turniere / Games and Tournaments | 179 | 04.03.2024 21:28 |
| Turnier: Excel Mach III vs Mephisto Glasgow Phoenix | applechess | Partien und Turniere / Games and Tournaments | 39 | 19.05.2023 08:04 |
| Partie: Match 120'/40, Excel Mach III - Super Forte C 6 MHz sel. 4 | applechess | Partien und Turniere / Games and Tournaments | 63 | 25.02.2020 11:44 |
| Partie: Match 120'/40 Excel Mach III-MM V+HG 550 | applechess | Partien und Turniere / Games and Tournaments | 56 | 16.01.2017 09:55 |
Alle Zeitangaben in WEZ +1. Es ist jetzt 07:17 Uhr.
Powered by vBulletin (Deutsch)
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Schachcomputer.info