To summarize the match Conny 3.6 versus T432

Final Conclusion:
Both computers have their charms, the Conny is more of an attacking style as the Turbostar. The Turbostar excells in his defensive resources and
might counterattack. In 2 games the Conny had the material upperhand but the Turbostar defended well and could turn both into a draw in the ending (G7 & G9).
I'd figure that these 2 games only on itself , could have balanced in the other way and the score might have been 6,5 - 6,5 !

As to middlegame tactics I would favour the Constellation a bit. Also positional play of the Conny is better , thats why he often takes the initiative but sometimes prematuraly (1game). The Turbostar may neglect his kingsafety (2games) or even let his Queen being trapped (1game).

The Conny is easily tempted to grab pawns when he has attacking options and releases hereby the pressure.
The Turbostar doesn't hesitate to reoganise his forces or counterattack on such a move.

The Conny's worst part, where he actually lost the championship (5 games) , is where he had to decide how and when to go from the middlegame into the endgame. Every time he exchanged pieces himself to the endgame he ruined his game choosing for a worse endgame. So he might be comparitively OK in the endgame but he had issues in deciding when and how to go into an ending. Something that in particular humans find very hard to assess as well. Only once he surprised with a pure pawn endgame win in game 10, I'm stunned by how he did it ! I count on many stronger chess computers not being able to complete the ending as he did.

Jetz suche ich noch ein gegner im 1700-1850 ELO bereich als Herausforderer.
Frage : Gibt es jemandem der Sinn hat um auf iSchach der nächste Herausforderer der Conny 3.6 zu sein ?