Hello dear all,
as planned, I ran the Khmelnitsky test. The computed score is 2233, that's in between the Millennium CGP first version (2144) and the Millennium The King Performance (2339).
Here is the usual graph:
I point out the unusual strength regarding standard endgame positions. There is knowledge inside!
I also drew the % achievement graph to compare to average skills of a human player achieving the same Khmelnitsky test performance, here you are:
The typical human player is better at strategy, endgame and sacrifice - that's rather common a pattern - but he is as well a better attacker. The Proelium leverages recognizing threats, strong defense and counterattack (these are usual strengths of chess programs).
Conditions were: Level TOU3 eventually halted once the maximum granted thinking time is reached (I use as a standard for this test 3 minutes to compute a position, if required 1 minute to compute a suggested move). I used the most aggressive setting (Style 5) as it performed best with the Spacious Mind reloaded test; I consider this choice somehow confirmed by the slightly weak score achieved for attack, despite the use of style 5. Pushing the aggressivity bar looks required. Of course, actual games are needed to make sure this choice pays back, maybe depending on the opponent's level (as suggested by Nick).
MfG,
Tibono