Hi Paul,

First off let me just say that communicating on a forum on a point of view can sometimes appear offhand, condescending or even rude especially if you are using translation. If that appears to be the case in my post please accept my profound apologies as this is not my intention.

Okay, disclaimer noted!

Let me put this thought to you. Let us say that a GK2100 running a 1MHz will look at 100 moves a second. And lets say that an average move time at game in 30 is 30secs.So a GK2100 running at 1MHz at game in 30 will calculate 30x100= 3,000 moves in 30secs. The CB-Emu GK2100 at 32Mhz at game in 30 will calculate 32x30x100= 96,000 moves in 30secs.

Now if I set the GK2100 32MHz to play game in 90 and the average move time is 90secs it will play 32x90x100=288,000 moves in 90 secs.

Now if I then increase the speed of time x3 it will look at 288,000 moves in 30secs against the normal GK2100 32MHz move calculation of 96,000 moves in 30secs. So although it is a GK2100 32MHz unit it is doing the work of a unit 3x faster, hence the 96MHz claim. Would you not agree?
The reason I am calling it 96MHz is because it is doing the work of a 96MHz unit even though it is a 32MHz unit. If I call it a 32MHz unit (which it is) the results would likely not be correct as it is running 3x faster.

I suppose I could call it GK2100 32MHz x3 to be absolutely correct. After all this is only a fun and interesting exercise. And if my claim of 96MHz is upsetting people on this site I can certainly change it.

What do you think?

Best regards

Clive