Einzelnen Beitrag anzeigen
  #25  
Alt 24.11.2025, 14:15
Benutzerbild von paulwise3
paulwise3 paulwise3 ist offline
Schachcomputer Koryphäe
 
Registriert seit: 19.02.2015
Ort: Eindhoven
Alter: 78
Land:
Beiträge: 1.683
Abgegebene Danke: 5.458
Erhielt 2.068 Danke für 865 Beiträge
Aktivitäten Langlebigkeit
5/20 10/20
Heute Beiträge
0/3 sssss1683
AW: Re: Dedicated Chess Computer Tourney

 Zitat von Major Chaos Beitrag anzeigen
Hi Paul,

Tibono is correct in that the GK2100 is running at 32MHz. However the 3x increase is because I am running the GK 3x faster in time compared with the other machines. Ie it is running game in 90 in 30 mins where as the other machines are running game in 30 in 30 mins.

I Think Tibono thought I was speeding all the machines up 3 times which of course would not make any difference.

Best regards

Clive
Hi Clive,

I now seem (!?) to understand what you mean. But in my opinion we are still talking about a GK2100 32 MHz. But because it's clock now runs 3 times faster, you have to set the level at game in 90 minutes, which results in game in 30 minutes in real time. But it still runs at 32 MHz.
We also have the Saitek Centurion, a clone of the GK2100. I have one which is tuned to 40 MHz. So it computes 4 times faster then the original. Also it's clock runs 4 times faster, so to simulate level 30 seconds per move I have to set the level at 2 minutes per move. Then it computes 30 seconds per move average. This is not an extra 4 times faster, but only to compensate for the clock running too fast!
Remember that if you set the level of your 32 MHz GK2100 to game in 30 minutes, it acts the same as a normal GK2100, it will play the same moves as a normal GK2100, but plays it's move at 10 seconds average. So no deeper or better play at all.
So in my opinion (and I think of most of us) you should call it just a 32 MHz GK2100.

Best regards,
Paul
__________________
Wenn ich mich irre, sollte es ein Horizont Wirkung sein
Mit Zitat antworten