Thema: Turnier: Schulanfängerliga
Einzelnen Beitrag anzeigen
  #15  
Alt 23.04.2025, 11:37
Benutzerbild von applechess
applechess applechess ist gerade online
Lebende Foren Legende
 
Registriert seit: 18.09.2011
Ort: Kanton Zürich
Land:
Beiträge: 7.967
Abgegebene Danke: 11.028
Erhielt 17.157 Danke für 6.031 Beiträge
Aktivitäten Langlebigkeit
14/20 13/20
Heute Beiträge
1/3 sssss7967
AW: Schulanfängerliga

Hallo Hartmut
Ja, das waren noch Zeiten, als die "Schachverrückten" fast jedes Programm
kauften und dieses trotz meistens noch ungenügender Spielstärke liebten.
Untern habe ich eine Partie im 1-Sek-Modus durch Chess Game Analyzer v0.12 von Arkadi Poliakevitch analysieren lassen. Die neueste Version 4.2.0.0 habe
ich noch nicht getestet. Unten der Output.
Gruss
Kurt

[Event "Schulanfängerliga"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "????.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Fidelity CC7 Chess Challenger"]
[Black "Saitek Sensor Chess (CSSS)"]
[Result "0-1"]
[Annotator "Stockfish 17.1 (1.0s/pos,thread=6)"]
[ECO "D10"]
[PlyCount "70"]

1. d4 $14 {0.33/23} ({Better is} 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 $14 {0.36/19}) ({Black is threatening} 1. Z0 e5 2. e4 Nf6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Nf3 O-O $15 {-0.29/25}) 1... d5 $6 $14 {0.26/27} ({Better is} 1... Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 d5 4. Nc3 Bb4 $10 {0.24/23}) ({White is threatening} 1... Z0 2. e4 $14 {0.97/21}) 2. c4 c6 $6 $14 {0.28/22} ({Better is} 2... e6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Bg5 dxc4 5. Nf3 c5 $10 {0.24/17}) ({White is threatening} 2... Z0 3. cxd5 $16 {1.25/21}) 3. Nc3 dxc4 $14 {0.34/23} ({Unsatisfactory is} 3... Nf6 $6 {in view of} 4. e3 e6 5. Nf3 Nbd7 6. Bd3 $14 {0.32/25}) 4. Bf4 $6 $15 {-0.33/21} ({More accurate is} 4. Nf3 b5 5. a4 b4 6. Ne4 Nf6 7. Nxf6+ $14 {0.39/24}) ({Another modest line is} 4. e3 b5 5. a4 b4 6. Ne4 Qd5 7. Nd2 $14 {0.29/24}) ({Black is threatening} 4. Z0 Nf6 5. g3 e6 6. Bg2 Nbd7 7. a4 Qa5 $15 {-0.52/23}) 4... Nf6 5. e4 $6 $15 {-0.48/23} ({Better is} 5. a4 Nd5 6. Bg3 e6 7. e4 Nxc3 8. bxc3 $15 {-0.27/20}) ({A fine line worth of consideration is} 5. Nf3 e6 6. a4 Bb4 7. g3 a5 8. Bg2 $15 {-0.37/20}) ({Black is threatening} 5. Z0 e6 6. Nf3 b5 7. a4 Nd5 8. g3 Bb7 $15 {-0.90/21}) 5... Bg4 $6 $14 {0.34/21} ({More accurate is} 5... b5 6. Nf3 e6 7. a4 Bb4 8. Qc2 a6 $15 {-0.52/13}) ({White is threatening} 5... Z0 6. Bxc4 b5 7. Bd3 b4 8. Na4 Qxd4 9. Nf3 $16 {1.39/22}) 6. Nf3 $10 {0.20/21} ({Better is} 6. f3 Be6 7. h4 Qa5 8. Nh3 Bxh3 9. Rxh3 $14 {0.37/21}) ({Black is threatening} 6. Z0 Bxd1 7. Rxd1 e6 8. Bxc4 Bb4 9. Bd3 Qxd4 $19 {-5.28/22}) 6... Bxf3 $6 $14 {0.95/22} ({More accurate is} 6... b5 7. h3 Bxf3 8. Qxf3 e6 9. Rd1 Bb4 $10 {0.17/17}) ({Another possibility is} 6... e6 $14 {0.60/17}) ({White is threatening} 6... Z0 7. Bxc4 Bxf3 8. gxf3 e6 9. Be3 Nbd7 10. Qc2 $16 {1.39/20}) 7. gxf3 $14 {0.65/21} ({Better is} 7. Qxf3 Qxd4 8. Rd1 Qc5 9. e5 Nd5 10. Nxd5 $14 {0.86/20}) ({Black is threatening} 7. Z0 Bxd1 8. Rxd1 e6 9. Bxc4 Bb4 10. O-O Bxc3 $19 {-6.49/21}) 7... b5 $14 {0.60/22} ({Not reliable is} 7... e6 $6 {in view of} 8. Bxc4 Be7 9. Rg1 a5 10. Be3 $14 {0.91/16}) 8. Bh3 $10 {0.14/22} ({More accurate is} 8. a4 $14 {0.79/18}) ({Black is threatening} 8. Z0 e6 $15 {-0.52/22}) 8... Nbd7 $10 {0.14/20} ({Better is} 8... e6 9. a4 Bb4 10. O-O O-O 11. axb5 Nh5 $10 {0.06/16}) ({White is threatening} 8... Z0 9. a4 $16 {1.07/20}) 9. d5 $6 $15 {-0.53/19} ({More accurate is} 9. e5 Nh5 10. Be3 e6 11. f4 g6 12. Qf3 $14 {0.47/15}) ({Also practical is} 9. O-O $10 {-0.10/15}) ({Black is threatening} 9. Z0 e5 10. Be3 Qc7 11. f4 exd4 12. Qxd4 Nc5 $17 {-1.07/20}) 9... cxd5 10. Bxd7+ $2 $17 {-1.50/22} ({More accurate is} 10. exd5 Nb6 11. d6 exd6 12. Nxb5 Nfd5 13. Bg3 $15 {-0.57/15}) ({Also promising is} 10. Nxd5 Rc8 11. Nxf6+ gxf6 12. Qd5 e6 13. Qxb5 $15 {-0.60/15}) ({Black is threatening} 10. Z0 e5 11. Bg5 d4 12. Bxd7+ Qxd7 13. Bxf6 gxf6 $17 {-2.69/20}) 10... Qxd7 11. exd5 $2 $17 {-2.81/20} ({More accurate is} 11. Nxd5 Nxd5 12. Qxd5 Qxd5 13. exd5 g6 14. a4 $17 {-1.57/16}) ({Black is threatening} 11. Z0 d4 12. Ne2 d3 13. Ng3 g6 14. Qd2 Bg7 $19 {-3.88/20}) 11... b4 12. Ne2 $17 {-2.92/19} ({Bad is} 12. Ne4 $4 {due to} Nxd5 13. Be3 e6 14. Qe2 Rc8 $19 {-3.17/17}) 12... Nxd5 13. Rc1 $4 $19 {-3.18/21} ({Better is} 13. O-O Rc8 14. a3 b3 15. Rc1 Nxf4 16. Qxd7+ $17 {-2.81/17}) ({Black is threatening} 13. Z0 Nxf4 14. Nxf4 Qxd1+ 15. Kxd1 g6 16. Kc2 e6 $19 {-3.98/20}) 13... c3 $17 {-1.87/23} ({More accurate is} 13... Rc8 14. O-O e6 15. Qd4 Nb6 16. Qe4 Bc5 $19 {-3.01/18}) ({A good alternative is} 13... Nb6 14. Qxd7+ Kxd7 15. O-O e6 16. Rfd1+ Kc6 $17 {-2.81/18}) 14. bxc3 $17 {-2.11/23} ({But not} 14. Qb3 $2 {due to} Nxf4 $17 {-2.43/19}) 14... bxc3 $17 {-1.68/21} ({Better is} 14... Nxf4 15. Nxf4 Qxd1+ 16. Kxd1 e6 17. Nd3 bxc3 $17 {-2.08/18}) ({Another interesting line is} 14... e6 15. O-O bxc3 16. Be5 Ba3 17. Rc2 f6 $17 {-1.85/18}) 15. Qd4 $2 $17 {-2.31/21} ({More accurate is} 15. Be5 e6 16. Nxc3 Bb4 17. O-O Bxc3 18. Bxc3 $17 {-1.70/17}) ({Black is threatening} 15. Z0 Nxf4 16. Nxf4 Qxd1+ 17. Kxd1 Rc8 18. Ne2 e6 $19 {-3.15/23}) 15... Nxf4 $17 {-2.10/20} ({Better is} 15... Rc8 16. O-O e6 17. Rfd1 c2 18. Rd3 Be7 $17 {-2.35/19}) 16. Qxd7+ $4 $19 {-3.41/21} ({More accurate is} 16. Qxf4 e6 17. Nxc3 Rc8 18. Rd1 Qc6 19. O-O $17 {-1.93/17}) ({Black is threatening} 16. Z0 Qxd4 17. Nxd4 e5 18. Nc6 h5 19. Kd1 Rh6 $19 {-6.26/21}) 16... Kxd7 17. Rd1+ $19 {-4.04/20} ({A nice try could be} 17. Nxf4 e6 18. O-O Rc8 19. Rfd1+ Bd6 20. Ne2 $19 {-3.25/14}) ({Black is threatening} 17. Z0 Nd3+ 18. Kd1 Nxc1 19. Nxc1 e6 20. Rg1 g6 $19 {-7.04/23}) 17... Kc6 $19 {-3.54/20} ({Better is} 17... Ke8 18. Nxf4 Rc8 19. Rd3 g6 20. Ne2 Bg7 $19 {-3.91/17}) 18. Nxf4 e6 $19 {-3.29/19} ({Better is} 18... g6 19. Nd5 Bg7 20. Ke2 Rhd8 21. Nxc3 Rxd1 $19 {-3.38/17}) 19. O-O $19 {-3.47/21} ({Better is} 19. Nd3 Rc8 20. Rb1 Bd6 21. Kd1 Rb8 22. Kc2 $19 {-3.27/17}) ({Black is threatening} 19. Z0 Rc8 20. Rd3 Bb4 21. Kd1 g5 22. Ng2 Rb8 $19 {-4.02/21}) 19... c2 $17 {-2.50/18} ({More accurate is} 19... Bb4 20. Ne2 Rhc8 21. Rb1 a5 22. Rb3 c2 $19 {-3.35/19}) ({Also playable is} 19... Rc8 20. Ne2 Bb4 21. Rb1 a5 22. Rfc1 Kd7 $19 {-3.31/19}) 20. Rd2 Bc5 $2 $16 {2.16/22} ({Excellent is} 20... Bd6 21. Rxc2+ Kd7 22. Rc4 Rhc8 23. Ra4 Rc5 $17 {-2.49/17}) ({Not to be underestimated is} 20... Rb8 $17 {-2.15/17}) 21. Rxc2 Rhc8 $16 {2.17/20} ({Not reliable is} 21... Rac8 $2 {in view of} 22. Rfc1 Kd6 23. Nd3 Bxf2+ 24. Kxf2 $16 {2.27/18}) 22. Rd1 $10 {0.19/28} ({Superior is} 22. Rfc1 Kd6 23. Nd3 Bxf2+ 24. Kxf2 Rxc2+ 25. Rxc2 $16 {2.19/15}) ({A good one too is} 22. Nd3 Kd6 23. Rfc1 Bxf2+ 24. Kxf2 Rxc2+ 25. Rxc2 $16 {2.18/15}) ({Black is threatening} 22. Z0 Kd7 23. Rd1+ Bd6 24. Rcd2 Rc6 25. Ne2 Ke7 $17 {-2.40/21}) 22... g5 $4 $18 {3.77/20} ({Excellent is} 22... Kb7 23. Rd7+ Ka6 24. Rxf7 Bb6 25. Re2 Rf8 $10 {0.16/18}) ({One that deserves attention is} 22... Kb5 $14 {0.49/18}) ({White is threatening} 22... Z0 23. Nd3 Kd7 24. Nxc5+ Ke7 25. Rdc1 a5 26. Rc4 $18 {4.19/21}) 23. Nh3 $4 $17 {-2.46/21} ({Excellent is} 23. Nd3 Kd6 24. Nxc5+ Ke7 25. Rdc1 f5 26. Kf1 $18 {3.79/19}) ({Also capable is} 23. Rdc1 gxf4 24. Rxc5+ Kd7 25. R1c4 Rxc5 26. Rxc5 $10 {-0.23/19}) ({Black is threatening} 23. Z0 gxf4 $19 {-4.64/20}) 23... f6 $15 {-0.57/20} ({Superior is} 23... Rd8 24. Rb1 h6 25. Kg2 Rd5 26. Ng1 Rad8 $17 {-2.56/18}) ({Also sufficient is} 23... Rc7 $17 {-1.60/18}) ({White is threatening} 23... Z0 24. Nxg5 $14 {0.54/21}) 24. f4 $4 $19 {-3.74/18} ({Excellent is} 24. Kg2 Rc7 25. f4 g4 26. Ng1 Kb7 27. Re2 $15 {-0.72/16}) ({Worthy of consideration is} 24. Rdc1 Kd5 25. Kg2 Rc7 26. f4 g4 27. Ng1 $15 {-0.74/16}) ({Black is threatening} 24. Z0 Rd8 $17 {-1.16/18}) 24... g4 25. Ng5 $19 {-3.83/20} ({Incorrect is} 25. f5 $4 {in view of} gxh3 26. fxe6 Rc7 27. Kf1 Re8 $19 {-3.91/15}) 25... fxg5 26. fxg5 $19 {-4.12/20} ({Inferior is} 26. Rdc1 $4 {due to} Kd6 27. fxg5 Rc7 28. h4 gxh3 $19 {-4.25/16}) 26... Kb5 $19 {-3.32/19} ({More accurate is} 26... Rc7 27. Re2 Rf8 28. Kg2 e5 29. Rxe5 Rxf2+ $19 {-3.99/17}) ({Another modest line is} 26... Rd8 27. Re1 Kd5 28. Rce2 Rd6 29. Re5+ Kc6 $19 {-3.94/17}) 27. Rb2+ $19 {-3.72/17} ({A nice try could be} 27. Rdc1 Kb6 28. Re1 Rc6 29. Kg2 a5 30. Rb1+ $19 {-3.22/16}) ({Black is threatening} 27. Z0 Bb6 28. Rb1+ Ka5 29. Re2 Rc5 30. Rxe6 Rxg5 $19 {-4.24/21}) 27... Kc4 $19 {-3.15/20} ({Better is} 27... Ka5 28. Re1 Bd4 29. Rb3 Rc4 30. g6 hxg6 $19 {-3.64/18}) ({A fine line worth of consideration is} 27... Ka6 28. Re1 Bb6 29. Re4 Rc5 30. Rxg4 Rf8 $19 {-3.55/18}) 28. Rd7 $4 $19 {-3.79/19} ({More accurate is} 28. Re2 Kb5 29. Kg2 Rc7 30. Rb1+ Ka6 31. Rxe6+ $17 {-2.95/15}) ({Black is threatening} 28. Z0 Bd4 29. Rb7 e5 30. Kg2 Rg8 31. h4 gxh3+ $19 {-4.13/18}) 28... Bd4 29. Rc2+ $19 {-4.99/21} ({A nice try could be} 29. Rb3 e5 30. Rxh7 Rg8 31. h4 gxh3 32. Kh2 $19 {-3.87/16}) ({Black is threatening} 29. Z0 Bxb2 30. Re7 Bd4 31. g6 hxg6 32. Rxe6 Kd3 $19 {-6.77/22}) 29... Kd3 30. Rxc8 $19 {-5.18/21} ({But not} 30. Rxd4+ $4 {thanks to} Kxd4 31. Re2 Rc1+ 32. Kg2 e5 $19 {-5.46/16}) 30... Rxc8 31. a4 $19 {-5.69/24} ({A nice try could be} 31. Rxh7 Rg8 32. Rh5 e5 33. Kg2 e4 34. Kg3 $19 {-5.18/16}) ({Black is threatening} 31. Z0 Rc5 32. Kg2 Rxg5 33. Rxh7 Rf5 34. Rh6 e5 $19 {-5.58/21}) 31... Rf8 32. Rxh7 $19 {Black will mate white in 21 moves} ({A nice try could be} 32. Kg2 Rxf2+ 33. Kg3 e5 34. Rxh7 e4 35. g6 $19 {-5.58/18}) ({Black is threatening} 32. Z0 e5 33. Kg2 Rxf2+ 34. Kg3 e4 35. Rxh7 e3 $19 {-6.88/21}) 32... Rxf2 33. g6 Ra2+ 34. Kh1 Ra1+ 35. Kg2 Rg1# {4 WBlunder: 5, WMistake: 3, WDubious: 3, BBlunder: 1, BMistake: 1, BDubious:} 0-1



Hier noch der Output, Stil Amateur, mit der Version 4.2.0.0

[Event "Schulanfängerliga"]
[Site "Computer"]
[Date "2025.04.15"]
[Round "2"]
[White "Fidelity CC7 Chess Challenger"]
[Black "Saitek Sensor Chess (CSSS)"]
[Result "0-1"]
[Annotator "Modus: Amateur"]
[ECO "D10"]
[WhiteElo "2200"]
[BlackElo "2200"]
[PlyCount "70"]
[EventDate "2025.??.??"]
[SourceVersionDate "2025.03.17"]

{chessgame-analyzer-4.2.0.0: Analyzed by PROMENADE (BelowNormal process priority), written by Private Engine by E. Nemeth, 6 threads, 1024 MB. ECO code: D10. Unknown opening. Unknown variation.} 1. d4 {0.00/37} d5 {0.00/34} 2. c4 {0.00/31} c6 {0.47/32} ({Not precise. (+0.47, 32) Better move was dxc4 (0.00, 31|39, 2.48MN/s)} 2... dxc4 3. e3 a6 4. Bxc4 Nf6 5. Nf3 c5 6. O-O $10) 3. Nc3 {0.32/26} dxc4 {0.32/24} 4. Bf4 {-0.41/24} ({Not precise. (-0.41, 24) Better move was e3 (+0.32, 24|46, 2.51MN/s)} 4. e3 b5 5. a4 b4 6. Ne4 Qd5 7. Nd2 c3 $14) 4... Nf6 {-0.15/24} {No choice} 5. e4 {-0.47/24} ({Inaccuracy. (-0.47, 24) The best continuation was a4 (-0.15, 24|33, 2.44MN/s)} 5. a4 Nd5 6. Bg3 Bf5 7. e3 Nb4 8. e4 Bg4 $10) 5... Bg4 {0.23/24} ({Not the best play (+0.23, 24) Better move was b5 (-0.47, 24|34, 2.42MN/s)} 5... b5 6. Be2 e6 7. Nf3 Be7 8. Qc2 Nbd7 9. h4 $15) 6. Nf3 {0.20/24} Bxf3 {0.68/24} ({Inaccuracy. (+0.68, 24) The best continuation was b5 (+0.20, 24|38, 2.14MN/s)} 6... b5 7. h3 Bxf3 8. Qxf3 e6 9. Rd1 Bb4 10. g4 $10) 7. gxf3 {0.68/24} b5 {0.58/24} 8. Bh3 {-0.06/24} ({Not the best play (-0.06, 24) The engine's best move was a4 (+0.58, 24|52, 2.27MN/s)} 8. a4 e6 9. axb5 cxb5 10. Nxb5 Bb4+ 11. Nc3 Nc6 $14) 8... Nbd7 {0.08/24} 9. d5 {-0.60/24} ({Inaccuracy. (-0.60, 24) The best continuation was e5 (+0.08, 24|39, 2.37MN/s)} 9. e5 b4 10. exf6 bxc3 11. fxg7 Bxg7 12. bxc3 e6 $10) 9... cxd5 {-0.43/24} 10. Bxd7+ {-1.49/24} ({Wrong move! (-1.49, 24) Better move was Nxd5 (-0.43, 24|45, 2.26MN/s)} 10. Nxd5 Rc8 11. Nxf6+ gxf6 12. Qd5 e6 13. Qxb5 Qb6 $15) 10... Qxd7 {-1.44/24} {No choice} 11. exd5 {-3.07/24} ({Wrong move! (-3.07, 24) The best continuation was Nxd5 (-1.44, 24|48, 2.19MN/s)} 11. Nxd5 Nxd5 12. Qxd5 Qxd5 13. exd5 Kd7 14. O-O-O g6 $17) 11... b4 {-2.87/24} {No choice} 12. Ne2 {-2.99/24} {Only so} Nxd5 {-2.95/24} {No choice} 13. Rc1 {-3.21/24} ({Okey (-3.21, 24) The engine's best move was Qd4 (-2.95, 24|32, 2.39MN/s)} 13. Qd4 Rc8 14. Bh6 Qe6 15. Bd2 c3 16. Be3 Qd7 $19) 13... c3 {-1.85/24} ({Wrong move! (-1.85, 24) Better move was Rc8 (-3.21, 24|37, 2.17MN/s)} 13... Rc8 14. Qd4 Nb6 15. Be3 Qxd4 16. Bxd4 f6 17. O-O $19) 14. bxc3 {-1.98/24} {No other move} bxc3 {-1.61/24} ({Not precise. (-1.61, 24) The engine's best move was e6 (-1.98, 24|40, 2.34MN/s)} 14... e6 15. O-O bxc3 16. Be5 Ba3 17. Rc2 f6 18. Bxc3 $19) 15. Qd4 {-2.71/24} ({Wrong move! (-2.71, 24) The engine's best move was Be5 (-1.61, 24|41, 2.40MN/s)} 15. Be5 e6 16. Nxc3 Bb4 17. O-O Bxc3 18. Bxc3 O-O $17) 15... Nxf4 {-2.06/24} ({Not precise. (-2.06, 24) The engine's best move was Rc8 (-2.71, 24|50, 2.41MN/s)} 15... Rc8 16. O-O e6 17. Rfd1 c2 18. Rd3 Be7 19. Be5 $19) 16. Qxd7+ {-3.52/24} ({Mistake! (-3.52, 24) Better move was Qxf4 (-2.06, 24|33, 2.34MN/s)} 16. Qxf4 e6 17. O-O Bd6 18. Qh4 O-O 19. Nxc3 Qd8 $19) 16... Kxd7 {-3.50/24} {No other move} 17. Rd1+ {-4.09/24} ({Not the best play (-4.09, 24) Better move was Nxf4 (-3.50, 24|41, 2.27MN/s)} 17. Nxf4 e6 18. O-O Bb4 19. Nd3 a5 20. a3 Bd6 $19) 17... Kc6 {-3.28/24} ({Inaccuracy. (-3.28, 24) The engine's best move was Ke8 (-4.09, 24|39, 2.23MN/s)} 17... Ke8 18. Nxf4 Rc8 19. Rc1 g6 20. Rc2 e6 21. Ke2 $19) 18. Nxf4 {-3.29/24} {No choice} e6 {-3.25/24} ({Good move! (-3.25, 24) The engine's best move was e5 (-3.29, 24|50, 2.38MN/s)} 18... e5 19. Nd3 Ba3 20. Ke2 Kd5 21. Nf4+ Kc4 22. Nd5 $19) 19. O-O {-3.21/24} c2 {-2.55/24} ({Not precise. (-2.55, 24) Better move was Rc8 (-3.21, 24|42, 2.40MN/s)} 19... Rc8 20. Ne2 Bb4 21. Rb1 a5 22. Rfc1 Kd7 23. Rb3 $19) 20. Rd2 {-2.57/24} ({It's playable (-2.57, 24) The best continuation was Rc1 (-2.55, 24|36, 2.45MN/s)} 20. Rc1 Kd7 21. Rxc2 Bd6 22. Rc4 Rhc8 23. Ra4 Rc5 $19) 20... Bc5 {2.02/24} ({Is it a joke?! From winning to losing! (+2.02, 24) The engine's best move was Bd6 (-2.57, 24|43, 2.40MN/s)} 20... Bd6 21. Rxc2+ Kd7 22. Rc4 Rhc8 23. Ra4 a5 24. Ne2 $19) 21. Rxc2 {2.01/24} {No other move} Rhc8 {1.97/24} {Nothing's better...} 22. Rd1 {0.16/24} ({Oh-Oh... From winning to drawing! (+0.16, 24) The engine's best move was Rfc1 (+1.97, 24|45, 2.09MN/s)} 22. Rfc1 Kd6 23. Nd3 Bxf2+ 24. Kxf2 Rxc2+ 25. Rxc2 Rb8 $18) 22... g5 {3.79/24} ({The worst move ever!! (+3.79, 24) The best continuation was Kb7 (+0.16, 24|38, 2.38MN/s)} 22... Kb7 23. Rd7+ Kb6 24. Rxf7 Rf8 25. Rxf8 Rxf8 26. Nxe6 $10) 23. Nh3 {-2.53/24} ({You must be kidding! From winning to losing! (-2.53, 24) Better move was Nd3 (+3.79, 24|47, 2.18MN/s)} 23. Nd3 Kd6 24. Nxc5+ Ke7 25. Rdc1 f5 26. Nb3 Rxc2 $18) 23... f6 {-0.44/24} ({The worst move ever!! (-0.44, 24) Better move was Rd8 (-2.53, 24|45, 2.23MN/s)} 23... Rd8 24. Rdc1 Rd5 25. f4 h6 26. fxg5 hxg5 27. Kg2 $19) 24. f4 {-4.56/24} ({Blunder!! (-4.56, 24) Better move was Kg2 (-0.44, 24|41, 2.61MN/s)} 24. Kg2 Rc7 25. f4 g4 26. Ng1 Kb7 27. Re2 Re8 $15) 24... g4 {-4.58/24} {No choice} 25. Ng5 {-4.69/24} fxg5 {-4.79/24} {No other move} 26. fxg5 {-4.88/24} ({It's playable (-4.88, 24) The engine's best move was h3 (-4.79, 24|38, 2.86MN/s)} 26. h3 gxh3 27. Re2 gxf4 28. Rxe6+ Kb7 29. Kh2 Rab8 $19) 26... Kb5 {-3.73/24} ({Bad play! (-3.73, 24) Better move was Rg8 (-4.88, 24|45, 2.32MN/s)} 26... Rg8 27. Re2 Rxg5 28. Rxe6+ Kb5 29. Rb1+ Ka5 30. Rf6 $19) 27. Rb2+ {-4.33/24} ({Not precise. (-4.33, 24) The best continuation was Rdc1 (-3.73, 24|42, 2.49MN/s)} 27. Rdc1 Rc7 28. a4+ Kb6 29. Re1 Re8 30. Kg2 Bd6 $19) 27... Kc4 {-3.69/24} ({Not precise. (-3.69, 24) Better move was Ka5 (-4.33, 24|39, 2.39MN/s)} 27... Ka5 28. a4 Rab8 29. Re2 Rf8 30. Rd7 Rf5 31. Rxh7 $19) 28. Rd7 {-4.50/24} ({Not the best play (-4.50, 24) The engine's best move was Rc2+ (-3.69, 24|37, 2.47MN/s)} 28. Rc2+ Kb5 29. Rdc1 Rc7 30. a4+ Kb6 31. Re1 Re8 $19) 28... Bd4 {-4.65/24} {Who are you?! Bobby? Garry?} 29. Rc2+ {-5.20/24} ({Not precise. (-5.20, 24) The engine's best move was Rb3 (-4.65, 24|33, 3.14MN/s)} 29. Rb3 Rg8 30. h4 gxh3 31. Rc7+ Kd5 32. Rd7+ Ke4 $19) 29... Kd3 {-5.27/24} {No other move} 30. Rxc8 {-5.61/24} ({Inaccuracy. (-5.61, 24) The engine's best move was Rb2 (-5.27, 24|39, 3.04MN/s)} 30. Rb2 Rcb8 31. Rd2+ Kxd2 32. Rxd4+ Kc2 33. h4 gxh3 $19) 30... Rxc8 {-5.95/24} {Only so} 31. a4 {-6.52/24} Rf8 {-6.62/24} 32. Rxh7 {-199.55/24} Rxf2 {-199.76/24} {No other move} 33. g6 {-123.00/24} ({Blunder!! (-123.00, 24) The engine's best move was Rd7 (-199.76, 24|26, 1.86MN/s)} 33. Rd7 Rf7+ 34. Rxd4+ Kxd4 35. Kg2 Rg7 36. Kg3 Rxg5 $10) 33... Ra2+ {-124.00/24} ({Mate in 3:} 33... Rd2+ 34. Kf1 Rd1+ 35. Kg2 Rg1#) 34. Kh1 {-124.00/24} ({Mate in 2:} 34. Kh1 Ra1+ 35. Kg2 Rg1#) 34... Ra1+ {-125.00/24} ({Mate in 2:} 34... Ra1+ 35. Kg2 Rg1#) 35. Kg2 {-125.00/24} ({Mate in 1:} 35. Kg2 Rg1#) 35... Rg1# 0-1


Geändert von applechess (23.04.2025 um 13:15 Uhr) Grund: Ergänzung
Mit Zitat antworten
Folgende 4 Benutzer sagen Danke zu applechess für den nützlichen Beitrag:
kamoj (24.04.2025), Mapi (23.04.2025), Tibono (23.04.2025), Wandersleben (23.04.2025)