Einzelnen Beitrag anzeigen
  #28  
Alt 23.07.2023, 20:00
Benutzerbild von Egbert
Egbert Egbert ist offline
Lebende Foren Legende
 
Registriert seit: 20.12.2009
Ort: Dreieich
Alter: 61
Land:
Beiträge: 10.507
Abgegebene Danke: 16.040
Erhielt 18.913 Danke für 7.169 Beiträge
Member Photo Albums
Aktivitäten Langlebigkeit
18/20 15/20
Heute Beiträge
2/3 ssss10507
AW: Khmelnitsky test: Mephisto IIIS Glasgow

 Zitat von Tibono Beitrag anzeigen
Of course I cannot leave without a synthesis: all in one graph!
A larger one to better zoom on the skills profiles:



...Maybe strategic elements are mainly computed at root level?

... Another small oddity lies in the calculations, where the fast IIIS performs less then the slow one; but otherwise the calculations scores look to range accordingly to expectations.
MfG, Eric
Hello Eric,

I think your assumption could well be correct Thomas Nitsche identified some of the weak points of Mephisto Glasgow in a lecture in 2016. Among other things, one of the main criticisms was that the programme did not consider field control in sufficient depth. This is in line with your observation that certain strategic elements are only taken into account at the root.

Best regards
Egbert
Mit Zitat antworten
Folgender Benutzer sagt Danke zu Egbert für den nützlichen Beitrag:
Tibono (23.07.2023)