Schachcomputer.info Community

Zurück   Schachcomputer.info Community > Schachcomputer / Chess Computer: > Partien und Turniere / Games and Tournaments


Antwort
 
Themen-Optionen Ansicht

  #1  
Alt 27.01.2022, 11:30
Benutzerbild von Ray
Ray Ray ist offline
Mephisto Lyon
 
Registriert seit: 07.12.2019
Ort: United Kingdom
Beiträge: 160
Abgegebene Danke: 51
Erhielt 313 Danke für 100 Beiträge
Aktivitäten Langlebigkeit
2/20 5/20
Heute Beiträge
0/3 ssssss160
10 game match between TheKing personalities

I’ve finally completed a 10 game match I’ve been wanting to do for some time between Millennium’s TheKing element set to play with it’s “Normal” personality and TheKing with the “King of Alabama” personality settings created by Spacious Mind. I know “King of Alabama” won in the Aegon 1997 Revisited tournament (played in 2019, how time flies!) achieving an ELO of 2761. This is extraordinary in my opinion, and all participants did well.

The rating achieved in the Aegon 1997 Revisited tournament was at a time control of 40/40, so an average of 1 minute per move. I have been interested to see how well TheKing element’s Normal personality would perform against King of Alabama at a time control of 40/120. Would this longer time control yield more draws or would one machine dominate?

Here are the King of Alabama settings:

PLAYER
PAWN:81
KNIGHT:86
BISHOP:86
ROOK:89
QUEEN:91
SPACE:91
MOBILITY:98
KING SAFETY:81
PASS PAWN:121
PAWN WEAK:81

OPPONENT
PAWN:81
KNIGHT:86
BISHOP:86
ROOK:89
QUEEN:91
SPACE:91
MOBILITY:98
KING SAFETY:121
PASS PAWN:81
PAWN WEAK:81

SELECTIVITY:14

For TheKing “Normal”, all settings are 100% except SELECTIVITY which is Auto.
I left Contempt and Randomness at their defaults for both personalities.

I wasn’t sure of The King Element’s actual ELO rating at a time control of 40/120 so looked it up on https://www.schachcomputer.info/html...elo_liste.html
Here, tournaments are conducted at 40/120 and TheKing has a rating of 2594 after 74 games. I’m guessing this was with it’s “Normal” personality.

Game 1 of 10
[Event "Battle of the Kings"]
[Site "?"]
[Round "1"]
[White "TheKing Normal"]
[Black "TheKing Alabama"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "B45"]

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nc6 5.Nc3 Nf6 6.Ndb5 d6 7.Bf4 e5 8.Bg5 a6
9.Bxf6 gxf6 10.Na3 d5 11.Nxd5 Bxa3 12.bxa3 Be6 13.Bc4 Qa5+ 14.Qd2 Qxd2+ 15.Kxd2
O-O-O 16.Kc3 f5 17.Nb6+ Kb8 18.exf5 Bxf5 19.Rad1 Nd4 20.f4 f6 21.fxe5 fxe5
22.Rhe1 Rhe8 23.Bd3 Bg6 24.a4 Re6 25.Nc4 Rc8 26.Kb2 e4 27.Bf1 Nc6 28.Nb6 Rd8
29.Rxd8+ Nxd8 30.Nd5 Nc6 31.Bc4 Re5 32.Ne3 Nd4 33.Kc3 Nf5 34.Nxf5 Bxf5 35.Kd4
Ra5 36.Bb3 Kc7 37.c4 Kd6 38.Bc2 b6 39.Bxe4 Bxe4 40.Rxe4 Rxa4 41.Rh4 Rxa2
42.Rh6+ Kc7 43.Rxh7+ Kc6 44.Rg7 Ra4 45.Rg6+ Kc7 46.Kc3 Ra3+ 47.Kb2 Ra4 48.Kb3
Ra1 49.h4 Rb1+ 50.Kc2 Rh1 51.g3 a5 52.Rg5 Kd6 53.h5 Rh2+ 54.Kb3 Rh3 55.Rg6+ Kc5
56.h6 Rh1 57.g4 Rh3+ 58.Ka4 Rh2 59.Re6 Rh1 60.g5 Ra1+ 61.Kb3 a4+ 62.Kb2 Rh1
63.Re2 b5 64.cxb5 Kxb5 65.Rg2 Kc5 66.Ka2 Kb4 67.g6 Rxh6 68.g7 Rh3 69.g8=Q Ra3+
70.Kb1 Rb3+ 71.Kc1 Rc3+ 72.Kd2 Ka3 73.Qf8+ Kb3 74.Qb8+ Ka3 75.Rg1 Rd3+ 76.Kxd3
Ka2 77.Rg2+ Ka3 78.Qb2# 1-0


The Sicilian, Taimanov/Sveshnikov opening was played.

HIARCS15 Analysis:
White: 1 mistake and 7 inaccuracies.
Black: 2 blunders and 9 inaccuracies.

The first dubious move made from the opening was by King of Alabama(KingA). In the following position King Normal (KingN) had just moved 10.Na3:

Here, KingA moved 10…d5?! This loses the pawn to White’s Knight on c3 and Black’s position quickly deteriorates. Strange to give away a Pawn especially as there did not seem to be any positional advantage.

Neither personality was perfect but in this game, KingN came out of the opening a Pawn up and more or less maintained its advantage all the way. The blunders made by KingA were in the end-game where it was going to lose anyway so I acedemic at this point.

Out of interest, at move 69 KingA announced it would be mated in 12, KingN announced mate in 13, but it actually took 17 ply moves.

So the first game goes to KingN.

I will post the next game shortly.
Mit Zitat antworten
Folgende 8 Benutzer sagen Danke zu Ray für den nützlichen Beitrag:
applechess (27.01.2022), dsommerfeld (27.01.2022), Egbert (27.01.2022), Mapi (27.01.2022), marste (27.01.2022), mclane (27.01.2022), Oberstratege (27.01.2022), Tibono (27.01.2022)
  #2  
Alt 27.01.2022, 14:19
Benutzerbild von Ray
Ray Ray ist offline
Mephisto Lyon
 
Registriert seit: 07.12.2019
Ort: United Kingdom
Beiträge: 160
Abgegebene Danke: 51
Erhielt 313 Danke für 100 Beiträge
Aktivitäten Langlebigkeit
2/20 5/20
Heute Beiträge
0/3 ssssss160
Re: 10 game match between TheKing personalities

Game 2 of 10

[Event "Battle of the Kings"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2022.01.06"]
[Round "2"]
[White "TheKing Alabama"]
[Black "TheKing Normal"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "A40"]

1.d4 e6 2.c4 Bb4+ 3.Bd2 c5 4.Bxb4 cxb4 5.Nf3 Nf6 6.g3 O-O 7.Bg2 d6 8.Nbd2 Nc6
9.O-O a5 10.e4 Qb6 11.e5 Nd7 12.exd6 Nxd4 13.Nxd4 Qxd4 14.Ne4 Qxc4 15.Qd2 f5
16.Rfc1 Qb5 17.Ng5 Nf6 18.Rc7 h6 19.Nf3 Rd8 20.Rac1 Qd5 21.R7c5 Qxd2 22.Nxd2 b6
23.Rc7 Rb8 24.Nb3 e5 25.f4 e4 26.Nd4 Bd7 27.Bh3 g6 28.Rd1 Ne8 29.Nc6 Bxc6
30.Rxc6 Rb7 31.g4 Rbd7 32.gxf5 gxf5 33.Bxf5 Rxd6 34.Rdxd6 Nxd6 35.Be6+ Kg7
36.Rxb6 Ne8 37.Ra6 Rd2 38.Rxa5 Rxb2 39.Bb3 Nf6 40.Re5 h5 41.h4 Rb1+ 42.Kg2 Rb2+
43.Kg3 Rd2 44.Rg5+ Kf8 45.f5 Ke7 46.Rg7+ Kd6 47.Rb7 Rd4 48.Kf4 e3+ 49.Kxe3 Rxh4
50.Rb6+ Ke5 51.Rb5+ Kd6 52.Ra5 Rg4 53.Kf3 Rd4 54.Bc2 Nd5 55.Ra6+ Ke7 56.Re6+
Kf8 57.Rh6 Rf4+ 58.Ke2 Nc3+ 59.Ke1 Nxa2 60.f6 Nc1 61.Kd2 b3 62.Bd1 Rd4+ 63.Kxc1
b2+ 64.Kxb2 Rxd1 65.Rxh5 Rf1 66.Kc3 Kf7 67.Re5 Rf4 68.Kd3 Kxf6 69.Re8 Kf5
70.Re7 Rg4 1/2-1/2


The Queen’s Pawn, Franco-Indian (Keres) Defence was played.

HIARCS15 Analysis:
White: 1 mistake and 3 inaccuracies.
Black: 1 mistake and 6 inaccuracies.

The first draw in the match. I adjourned the game at move 70 at the following position:


Both Kings were consistently showing an eval of 0.00. Did not see any need to carry on shuffling pieces back and forth.

Current score 1½ - ½ to KingN.
Mit Zitat antworten
  #3  
Alt 27.01.2022, 14:23
Benutzerbild von Ray
Ray Ray ist offline
Mephisto Lyon
 
Registriert seit: 07.12.2019
Ort: United Kingdom
Beiträge: 160
Abgegebene Danke: 51
Erhielt 313 Danke für 100 Beiträge
Aktivitäten Langlebigkeit
2/20 5/20
Heute Beiträge
0/3 ssssss160
Re: 10 game match between TheKing personalities

Game 3 of 10

[Event "Battle of the Kings"]
[Site "?"]
[Round "3"]
[White "TheKing Normal"]
[Black "TheKing Alabama"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "B23"]

1.e4 c5 2.Ne2 Nc6 3.Nbc3 e6 4.d4 d5 5.exd5 exd5 6.Be3 c4 7.g3 Nf6 8.Bg2 Be7
9.O-O O-O 10.Nf4 Bg4 11.Qc1 Be6 12.a3 Qd7 13.Qd2 Bd8 14.b3 Ba5 15.b4 Bb6
16.Rfe1 a6 17.Rab1 Ne7 18.Nxe6 fxe6 19.f3 Ne8 20.Bh3 Nf5 21.a4 Ned6 22.a5 Bd8
23.Bf4 Bf6 24.Be5 Rae8 25.Bxf6 Rxf6 26.Re2 Nf7 27.Rbe1 Qd6 28.f4 Qd7 29.g4 Nh4
30.Rf1 Nd8 31.f5 Nc6 32.Qf4 h6 33.Qe3 Re7 34.Qf2 g5 35.Bg2 Nxb4 36.Rb1 Nxg2
37.Qxg2 Nc6 38.fxe6 Rfxe6 39.Rxe6 Rxe6 40.Qxd5 Qxd5 41.Nxd5 Nxa5 42.Kf2 b5
43.Nc7 Rc6 44.Ra1 Rxc7 45.Rxa5 b4 46.Rxa6 Rb7 47.Ke2 b3 48.cxb3 cxb3 49.Ra1 Rc7
50.Kd3 Rc2 51.Ra8+ Kf7 52.Ra7+ Kf8 53.Ra8+ Ke7 54.Ra7+ Kd6 55.Rb7 Rxh2 56.Rxb3
Rh4 57.Kc4 Rxg4 58.Rb6+ Ke7 59.Rxh6 Rh4 60.Rg6 Rh5 61.Rc6 Kf7 62.Rc5 Kf6 63.Kd3
Rh1 64.Rc8 Kf5 65.Rf8+ Kg4 66.d5 Rd1+ 67.Ke4 Kh4 1/2-1/2


The Sicilian, Chameleon variation was played.

HIARCS15 Analysis:
White: 8 inaccuracies.
Black: 5 inaccuracies.

Up until move 31 (see diagram) both players were about equal.


However, KingN made the following dubious move: 32 Qf4?!
Surely it mis-calculated the target square g5 attacking the troublesome Knight on h4?

From here, KingA was keeping its head above water but did not play the endgame so well and lost it’s slight advantage with the final result being a draw.

At move 67 I adjourned the game as both players were consistently showing an eval of 0.00.

Current score: 2 – 1 to KingN.
Mit Zitat antworten
  #4  
Alt 27.01.2022, 14:26
Benutzerbild von Ray
Ray Ray ist offline
Mephisto Lyon
 
Registriert seit: 07.12.2019
Ort: United Kingdom
Beiträge: 160
Abgegebene Danke: 51
Erhielt 313 Danke für 100 Beiträge
Aktivitäten Langlebigkeit
2/20 5/20
Heute Beiträge
0/3 ssssss160
Re: 10 game match between TheKing personalities

Game 4 of 10

[Event "Battle of the Kings"]
[Site "?"]
[Round "4"]
[White "TheKing Alabama"]
[Black "TheKing Normal"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "A29"]

1.c4 Nf6 2.Nc3 e5 3.Nf3 Nc6 4.g3 Bc5 5.Nxe5 Nxe5 6.d4 Qe7 7.Bg2 Nxc4 8.dxc5
Qxc5 9.b3 Ne5 10.Bd2 d5 11.O-O c6 12.Rc1 Qe7 13.Bg5 Bf5 14.Re1 Rd8 15.Bxf6 gxf6
16.Qd4 O-O 17.Qxa7 Rfe8 18.h3 d4 19.Na4 Qb4 20.Red1 d3 21.exd3 Nxd3 22.Rc4 Qe7
23.Qb6 Ne5 24.Rxd8 Rxd8 25.Rf4 Be6 26.Qa7 Rd1+ 27.Kh2 Nd3 28.Re4 Ne5 29.Nc3 Rd2
30.Rf4 Ng6 31.Qe3 Nxf4 32.Qxd2 Nxg2 33.Kxg2 Bf5 34.f3 Bg6 35.Ne2 Qe5 36.h4 Kg7
37.g4 h6 38.Nf4 Qe7 39.Nh3 Qc5 40.Nf2 Qd5 41.Qe3 Qd6 42.Qb6 Qd7 43.h5 Bb1 44.a3
f5 45.Qb4 f6 46.Qc3 Qe6 47.Qb2 Qe1 48.b4 b5 49.Qd4 Qe6 50.Qa7+ Qf7 51.Qc5 Qe6
52.Qc1 Ba2 53.gxf5 Qxf5 54.Ng4 Qg5 55.Qxc6 Bf7 56.Kf2 Qd2+ 57.Kg3 Qe1+ 58.Kf4
Qd2+ 59.Ke4 Qg5 60.Ne3 Qe5+ 61.Kd3 Bxh5 62.Qd7+ Kf8 63.f4 Bg6+ 64.f5 Be8 65.Qd5
Qa1 66.Qd6+ Kg7 67.Qc7+ Bf7 68.Ke4 Qxa3 69.Qa5 Qa4 70.Qxa4 bxa4 71.b5 Be8 72.b6
Bc6+ 73.Kd4 h5 74.Kc5 Bb7 75.Kb4 Kh6 76.Kxa4 h4 77.Kb5 Kg5 78.Kc5 h3 79.Nf1
Kxf5 80.Kd6 Kg4 81.Ke6 f5 82.Ke5 Ba6 83.Kf6 f4 84.Ke5 f3 85.Kd4 Kf4 86.Kc3 f2
87.Kb4 Kf3 88.Ka5 Bb7 89.Kb5 Kg2 90.Ne3+ Kg1 91.Kb4 h2 92.Ng4 h1=Q 93.Nxf2 Kxf2
94.Kc3 Qa1+ 95.Kc4 Qa4+ 96.Kc5 Qf4 97.Kb5 Qd4 98.Ka5 Qc3+ 99.Kb5 Bc6+ 100.Ka6
Qa1# 0-1

The English, Bremen was played.

HIARCS15 Analysis:
White: 2 blunders, 2 mistakes and 5 inaccuracies.
Black: 2 inaccuracies.

In this game there was the usual fractional evaluation swings from one side to the other until the end game where KingA was totally outplayed.

Here is the position after Black moved his Queen 69…Qa4:

An interesting position and one in which White needs to be very careful! Unfortunately, KingA makes the blunder with the move 70.Qxa4? White cannot now stop Black from Queening with passed pawns on both sides of the board. A couple of moves on and KingA’s evaluation is -0.25 looking 06|15 (6 moves brute force and 15 moves selective) ahead. KingN’s evaluation is more accurate at 1.49 with lookahead of 12|13 (12 moves brute force, 13 selective). In fact, it’s my strong belief that KingN’s more brute force approach in this end game has been more beneficial. KingA’s more selective search has maybe missed its nuances.

Current score 3 – 1 to KingN.
Mit Zitat antworten
  #5  
Alt 27.01.2022, 14:30
Benutzerbild von Ray
Ray Ray ist offline
Mephisto Lyon
 
Registriert seit: 07.12.2019
Ort: United Kingdom
Beiträge: 160
Abgegebene Danke: 51
Erhielt 313 Danke für 100 Beiträge
Aktivitäten Langlebigkeit
2/20 5/20
Heute Beiträge
0/3 ssssss160
Re: 10 game match between TheKing personalities

Game 5 of 10

[Event "Battle of the Kings"]
[Site "?"]
[Round "5"]
[White "TheKing Normal"]
[Black "TheKing Alabama"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "A20"]

1.c4 e5 2.Nf3 e4 3.Nd4 Nc6 4.e3 Nf6 5.d3 Bb4+ 6.Bd2 Bxd2+ 7.Nxd2 Nxd4 8.exd4 d5
9.dxe4 dxe4 10.Nb3 a5 11.Be2 Qd6 12.O-O O-O 13.a4 Re8 14.Qd2 Bg4 15.Rfc1 c5
16.Rd1 cxd4 17.Qxd4 Qb4 18.Bxg4 Nxg4 19.Qc3 Qxc3 20.bxc3 Ne5 21.Rd4 f5 22.Rb1
b6 23.c5 Rab8 24.cxb6 Rxb6 25.Rd5 Nc4 26.Rb5 Rxb5 27.axb5 a4 28.Nd4 Ra8 29.Nxf5
Na3 30.Rc1 Nxb5 31.c4 Nc7 32.Nd6 a3 33.Ra1 Ra5 34.Kf1 a2 35.Nxe4 Na6 36.Ke2 Nb4
37.Kd2 Ra3 38.Kc1 Rd3 39.Kb2 h5 40.Nc5 Rd2+ 41.Kc3 Rxf2 42.Kxb4 Rxg2 43.h3 Kf7
44.Ne4 Rb2+ 45.Kc5 Rh2 46.Kd5 Ke7 47.c5 g6 48.c6 Rc2 49.Re1 Re2 50.Rf1 Rc2
51.h4 Ke8 52.Kd6 Rc4 53.c7 Rxc7 54.Kxc7 Ke7 55.Ng5 a1=R 56.Rxa1 Kf6 57.Kd6 Kf5
58.Ra4 Kf6 59.Rf4+ Kg7 60.Rf7+ Kh8 61.Ke5 Kg8 62.Kf6 Kh8 63.Rf8# 1-0

The English, Nimzowitsch, Flohr variation was played.

HIARCS15 Analysis:
White: 2 mistakes and 2 inaccuracies.
Black: 2 mistakes and 5 inaccuracies.

This game was fairly even for both sides until about half way through. See the following position:

Here, White had just played 33.Ra1 and Black has two passed Pawns marching down the board. His Pawn on a3 is the most troublesome. From here Black played 33…Ra5 which is a mistake according to H15. The better move is 33…a2 The plan then is for Black to move it’s Knight and Rook down forcing White to defend and ultimately losing it’s Knight in the process. I don’t think this is necessarily beyond TheKing’s ability to see, but maybe the more selective searching of KingA missed this particular variation?

Looking a few moves on in the following position, White had just played 39.Kb2:

KingN is now in a better position and a pawn up. It also probable Black’s Pawn on a2 will be lost at some point. KingA’s evaluation was -0.7 whilst KingN’s was 1.52 which is the closer value to H15’s 2.18. It’s from this point that KingN’s endgame is better.

Here is another example where KingA’s more selective searching may be the cause of missing nuances of an endgame:

KingN as White had just played 47.c5 Marching towards the queening square. Here, KA played 47…g6!? Now, White can advance his Pawn again! Black should have played 47…Kd7. In this position KingN was searching ahead with 9 brute force and 10 selective moves (09|10) whilst KingA was searching with 02|11, so I think this is where the more brute force option selected by KingN has been more beneficial. But this is just an impression.

Current score 4 – 1 to KingN
It’s looking a little one-sided but things could change.
Mit Zitat antworten
  #6  
Alt 27.01.2022, 14:34
Benutzerbild von Ray
Ray Ray ist offline
Mephisto Lyon
 
Registriert seit: 07.12.2019
Ort: United Kingdom
Beiträge: 160
Abgegebene Danke: 51
Erhielt 313 Danke für 100 Beiträge
Aktivitäten Langlebigkeit
2/20 5/20
Heute Beiträge
0/3 ssssss160
Re: 10 game match between TheKing personalities

Game 6 of 10

[Event "Battle of the Kings"]
[Site "?"]
[Round "6"]
[White "TheKing Alabama"]
[Black "TheKing Normal"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "A20"]

1.c4 e5 2.Nf3 e4 3.Nd4 Nf6 4.Nc3 Nc6 5.e3 Bc5 6.d3 Nxd4 7.exd4 Bxd4 8.dxe4
Bxc3+ 9.bxc3 Nxe4 10.Ba3 d6 11.Bd3 Nc5 12.Bxc5 dxc5 13.O-O O-O 14.Re1 g6 15.Re3
Re8 16.Qf3 Rxe3 17.Qxe3 Be6 18.Be4 c6 19.Qxc5 Qd2 20.Qb4 Re8 21.Qxb7 Qxc3
22.Rf1 Bxc4 23.Qxc6 Rxe4 24.Qa8+ Kg7 25.Qxe4 Bxf1 26.Kxf1 Qa1+ 27.Qe1 Qxa2
28.Qe5+ f6 29.Qc7+ Qf7 30.Qc5 Qd7 31.g3 g5 32.Qa5 h5 33.Qc5 Qa4 34.Qe7+ Kg6
35.Qd8 Qb5+ 36.Ke1 a5 37.Kd2 Kf5 38.f3 a4 39.Qd4 Qc6 40.Qe3 Kg6 41.Qc3 Qxc3+
42.Kxc3 Kf5 43.h3 h4 44.gxh4 gxh4 45.Kb4 Kf4 46.Kxa4 Kxf3 47.Kb3 f5 48.Kc4 Ke3
49.Kd5 f4 50.Ke5 f3 51.Kf5 Kd4 52.Kg4 f2 53.Kf5 f1=Q+ 54.Ke6 Qf8 55.Kd7 Kd5
56.Kc7 Kc5 57.Kd7 Qf7+ 58.Kd8 Kd6 59.Kc8 Qc7# 0-1

The English, Nimzowitsch, Flohr variation was played again. This makes it interesting to compare with Game 5.

HIARCS15 Analysis:
White: 2 blunders and 5 inaccuracies.
Black: 2 inaccuracies.

This game was not good for KingA. He lost a Pawn early in the game and never recovered.
In the following position Black had just played 40…Kg6:

KingN(Black) is in a reasonably good position and White will have to fight hard. However, KingA blundered with the move 41.Qc3?? What!? An exchange of Queens leaves White with Pawns marching down from both sides of the board with his King caught in the middle.
Play continued 41…Qxc3 42.Kxc3 The expected Queen exchange. 42…Kf5 Black brings his King into position for the fight:

Here, KingN search depth is 16|17 whilst KingA’s is 09|18 but the extra selectivity does not help. Here he blunders again and moves 43.h3?? He obviously does not care about Black’s Pawn on a4. Surely 43.Kb4 would have been better? Now, White cannot prevent Black from Queening.

Current Score 5 – 1 to KingN
Mit Zitat antworten
  #7  
Alt 27.01.2022, 14:39
Benutzerbild von Ray
Ray Ray ist offline
Mephisto Lyon
 
Registriert seit: 07.12.2019
Ort: United Kingdom
Beiträge: 160
Abgegebene Danke: 51
Erhielt 313 Danke für 100 Beiträge
Aktivitäten Langlebigkeit
2/20 5/20
Heute Beiträge
0/3 ssssss160
Re: 10 game match between TheKing personalities

Game 7 of 10

[Event "Battle of the Kings"]
[Site "?"]
[Round "7"]
[White "TheKing Normal"]
[Black "TheKing Alabama"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "A00"]

1.b4 e5 2.Bb2 e4 3.c4 Nf6 4.a3 c5 5.bxc5 Bxc5 6.e3 O-O 7.Nc3 d6 8.Nge2 Nc6
9.Ng3 Bg4 10.Qc2 Re8 11.h3 Be6 12.Ncxe4 Nxe4 13.Nxe4 Bb6 14.f4 Bf5 15.Bd3 Bd4
16.Rb1 d5 17.Nf6+ Qxf6 18.Bxf5 Bxb2 19.Rxb2 Nd4 20.Bxh7+ Kh8 21.Qb1 dxc4 22.O-O
Nb3 23.Bf5 Rad8 24.Rf2 b5 25.Ra2 a5 26.Bg4 Kg8 27.Qc2 Qb6 28.a4 Qa6 29.axb5
Qxb5 30.Bf5 Qb4 31.Bh7+ Kf8 32.Bf5 Rd6 33.Rb2 a4 34.Ra2 a3 35.Bg4 Kg8 36.Bf3
Red8 37.Qc3 Qxc3 38.dxc3 Ra6 39.Rfc2 f5 40.Kf2 g6 41.e4 fxe4 42.Bxe4 Kg7 43.Bf3
Nc5 44.Kg1 Nd3 45.Be2 Ra7 46.Kh2 Rb8 47.Bxd3 cxd3 48.Rd2 Rb3 49.Rxd3 Rb2 50.Ra1
a2 51.Rdd1 Rc2 52.Kg1 Rxc3 53.Rd2 Rca3 54.Kf2 Kf6 55.g3 Kf5 56.Rd5+ Ke6 57.Rd2
R7a6 58.Ke1 Kf5 59.Re2 R6a5 60.Rg2 Ke4 61.Kd2 Kf3 62.Rgg1 Rc5 63.Rae1 Rb5
64.Kc2 Rab3 65.f5 gxf5 66.g4 f4 67.g5 Rb2+ 68.Kd3 R5b3+ 69.Kd4 Rb1 70.Ref1+ Ke2
71.Rg2+ Kxf1 72.Rxa2 f3 73.Ke5 Ke1 74.Ra4 f2 75.Re4+ Kd2 76.Rf4 f1=Q 77.Rxf1
Rxf1 78.h4 Re3+ 79.Kd6 Rd1 80.Kc5 Kc3 81.Kc6 Re6+ 82.Kc7 Re7+ 83.Kc6 Kc4 84.h5
Red7 85.Kb6 R1d6+ 86.Ka5 Ra7# 0-1

Unusual opening played A00: Sokolsky (Polish/Orangutan) and the first win for King of Alabama.

HIARCS15 Analysis:
White: 2 mistakes and 11 inaccuracies.
Black: 1 mistake and 8 inaccuracies.

KingN shows it can also mess up in the endgame. Take this position from the game. Black had just moved 62…Rc5:

White now played 63.Rae1? Possibly thinking of then moving it to e3. However, this give Black time to double his Rooks on the b file and White wont be able to defend against the Rooks and advanced Pawn, as can be witnessed. The better line would have been 63. Rgf1+ Ke4 64.Rf2 Kd4 65. Re5 now White has a double attack on the troublesome Pawn on a2. 65…Rca5 66.Rd2+ Ke3 67.Rb2 Ke4 Giving an equal position:


KingN did not play this endgame so well, but KingA certainly showed what it can do.

Current Score 5 – 2 to KingN
Mit Zitat antworten
  #8  
Alt 27.01.2022, 14:43
Benutzerbild von Ray
Ray Ray ist offline
Mephisto Lyon
 
Registriert seit: 07.12.2019
Ort: United Kingdom
Beiträge: 160
Abgegebene Danke: 51
Erhielt 313 Danke für 100 Beiträge
Aktivitäten Langlebigkeit
2/20 5/20
Heute Beiträge
0/3 ssssss160
Re: 10 game match between TheKing personalities

Game 8 of 10

[Event "Battle of the Kings"]
[Site "?"]
[Round "8"]
[White "TheKing Alabama"]
[Black "TheKing Normal"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "B30"]

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 e6 4.c3 a6 5.Bxc6 dxc6 6.O-O Nf6 7.d3 Be7 8.e5 Nd7
9.Nbd2 Qc7 10.Re1 O-O 11.Nb3 a5 12.Bf4 b5 13.Qe2 a4 14.Nbd2 Nb6 15.Ne4 Nd5
16.Bg5 Bxg5 17.Nexg5 a3 18.b3 Nxc3 19.Qc2 b4 20.d4 f5 21.exf6 gxf6 22.Ne4 cxd4
23.Nxd4 e5 24.Nxc3 bxc3 25.Ne2 Be6 26.Rac1 Kh8 27.Qxc3 Bd5 28.Ng3 Qa7 29.Ne4
Rg8 30.g3 Qg7 31.f3 Rad8 32.Nc5 h5 33.Kf2 h4 34.Rg1 Qh6 35.Rh1 Bf7 36.Ne4 f5
37.Qxe5+ Rg7 38.Nc3 Rd2+ 39.Ne2 Rxa2 40.Qxf5 Bxb3 41.Qe5 Rb2 42.Rhe1 Qg5
43.Qxg5 Rxg5 44.Rxc6 Re5 45.Rc8+ Kg7 46.Rc7+ Kf6 47.Rc6+ Re6 48.Rxe6+ Bxe6
49.Ke3 h3 50.g4 a2 51.Nc3 Rxh2 52.Kf4 Rg2 53.Nxa2 Bxa2 54.Re8 Kg7 55.Re5 Bf7
56.Re1 h2 57.Rh1 Kf6 58.Ke4 Kg5 59.Ke3 Be8 60.Kd4 Bc6 61.Ke3 Ra2 62.Re1 Ra3+
63.Kd4 Bxf3 64.Rb1 Bg2 65.Kc5 Rf3 66.Kd4 Bf1 67.Rb8 h1=Q 68.Rg8+ Kf6 69.Rf8+
Ke7 70.Re8+ Kxe8 71.Ke5 Re3+ 72.Kd6 Qh6+ 73.Kc5 Kd7 74.Kb4 Qd6+ 75.Ka5 Ra3# 0-1

The Sicilian, Nimzowitsch-Rossolimo Attack was played.

HIARCS15 Analysis:
White: 1 blunder, 1 mistake and 7 inaccuracies.
Black: 2 inaccuracies.

In this game, KingA had a slight edge for the first half but then was outplayed for the remainder of the game. In the following position KingN (Black) played 33…h4

The idea being if 35. gxh then White’s in trouble! However, H15 thought 33…Qg6 was better.
White then played 34.Rg1 Obviously concerned with his Pawn on g3, but this takes the Rook away from the center. Better would have been 34.g4.
Play continued with 34…Qh6 (see diagram)

Here, White played 35.Rh1?! This does not serve much purpose, there is still pressure on the g3 Pawn. But, KingN is not without issue. He misses a chance to put White into real trouble:

From this position KingN played 35…Bf7?! Better would have been 35…Bc4 White dare not capture this Bishop! If 36.bxB Rd2+ 37. Ke1 Rgd8 and it’s looking grim. If instead he captures with his Queen then 36.QxB is even worse. 36…Rd2+ and White cannot retreat with 37.Kf1 as it will be mate in 2, so the only option is 37.Qe2 and the outlook is bleak. However, this is academic as things just worsened for White.

Here is an example of poor endgame play this time from KingA:

It’s not looking good for White, he’s going to lose but from this position he moved 52.Kf4? Better would have been 52.Ne4+ Kg6 53.Nf2 blocking off Black’s Rook. However, actual play continued with 52…Rg2 (see diagram):

Now it was White’s move and KingA blundered with 53.Nxa2?? Why sacrifice his Knight? 53.Ne4+ would have given a bit of a fight! At move 66 KingN announced mate in 12, and at move 67 KingA saw that it would be mated in 14. It took 18 ply moves in the end.

Current Score 6 – 2 to KingN
Mit Zitat antworten
  #9  
Alt 27.01.2022, 14:45
Benutzerbild von Ray
Ray Ray ist offline
Mephisto Lyon
 
Registriert seit: 07.12.2019
Ort: United Kingdom
Beiträge: 160
Abgegebene Danke: 51
Erhielt 313 Danke für 100 Beiträge
Aktivitäten Langlebigkeit
2/20 5/20
Heute Beiträge
0/3 ssssss160
Re: 10 game match between TheKing personalities

Game 9 of 10

[Event "Battle of the Kings"]
[Site "?"]
[Round "9"]
[White "TheKing Normal"]
[Black "TheKing Alabama"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "A05"]

1.Nf3 Nf6 2.b3 g6 3.Bb2 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.Bc4 O-O 6.Qe2 c5 7.d4 cxd4 8.Bxd4 Nc6
9.Bc3 Bg4 10.Nbd2 Nd5 11.Bxg7 Nf4 12.Qf1 Kxg7 13.O-O-O Qa5 14.Kb2 f5 15.exf5 d5
16.Bb5 Rac8 17.Bxc6 Rxc6 18.c4 Bxf5 19.Nb1 dxc4 20.Qe1 Nd3+ 21.Rxd3 Qxe1
22.Rxe1 cxd3 23.Rxe7+ Kg8 24.Rxb7 Be4 25.Rxa7 Bxf3 26.gxf3 Rxf3 27.b4 Rxf2+
28.Kb3 Rc1 29.Nc3 Rxh2 30.Ra8+ Kg7 31.Ra7+ Kf8 32.Ra8+ Ke7 33.Ra7+ Kd8 34.Ra8+
Kc7 35.Ne4 Re2 36.Ra7+ Kc6 37.Ra6+ Kb7 38.Rd6 Rxe4 39.Rxd3 h5 40.a3 h4 41.Kb2
Rec4 42.Rd7+ Rc7 43.Rd8 h3 44.Rh8 R1c2+ 45.Kb3 R2c3+ 46.Kb2 Rg3 47.Rf8 Re7
48.Rf2 Rg2 49.Rc2 Rxc2+ 50.Kxc2 Rc7+ 51.Kd2 Rd7+ 52.Ke3 h2 53.Kf4 h1=Q 54.b5
Qc1+ 55.Ke4 Qc4+ 56.Kf3 Rd3+ 57.Kf2 Qc2+ 58.Ke1 Rd1# 0-1

The Reti, Nimzowitsch-Larsen Attack was played and KingA shows what it can do!

HIARCS15 Analysis:
White: 1 mistake and 5 inaccuracies.
Black: 1 inaccuracy.

Up until move 10 in the opening it was fairly evenly matched. See diagram:

Here Black has a slightly better position. White’s Bishop on c3 is under attack from Black’s Knight and Bishop so he needs to handle this correctly. There are a few options here:
If 11.exd5 Bxc3 threatening the Rook 11.Rd1 Nd4 and White’s in difficulty. A better line goes:
11.Bxd5 Bxc3 12.Rd1 Ne5 13.h3 Nxf3+ 14.gxf3 and White has a much better game.
However, KingN opts for 11.Bxg7?! Play continues with 11…Nf4 attacking the Queen. 12.Qf1 the safest as 12.Qd1 maintains Blacks skewer with his Bishop on g4. 12…Kxg7 13.O-O-O Qa5 and Black is in a healthy position. In fact, from here KingA stormed through to a win in the shortest game so far at 58 moves.

I think KingA’s extra selectivity helped secure this game, and from the opening it found the best moves. A good win!

Current Score 6 – 3 to KingN
So, even if KingA wins the next game it wont win this match, but seems to be catching up.
Mit Zitat antworten
  #10  
Alt 27.01.2022, 14:52
Benutzerbild von Ray
Ray Ray ist offline
Mephisto Lyon
 
Registriert seit: 07.12.2019
Ort: United Kingdom
Beiträge: 160
Abgegebene Danke: 51
Erhielt 313 Danke für 100 Beiträge
Aktivitäten Langlebigkeit
2/20 5/20
Heute Beiträge
0/3 ssssss160
Re: 10 game match between TheKing personalities

Game 10 of 10

[Event "Battle of the Kings 1"]
[Site "?"]
[Round "10"]
[White "TheKing Alabama"]
[Black "TheKing Normal"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "D12"]

1.c4 c6 2.Nf3 d5 3.e3 Nf6 4.d4 Bf5 5.Nc3 e6 6.Be2 Bd6 7.Nh4 Be4 8.f3 Bg6 9.Qb3
b6 10.cxd5 cxd5 11.Qa4+ Nbd7 12.Nxg6 hxg6 13.e4 dxe4 14.fxe4 Rxh2 15.Rxh2 Bxh2
16.Bg5 e5 17.Rd1 exd4 18.Rxd4 a6 19.Nd5 b5 20.Qa3 Bg1 21.Rd2 Bc5 22.b4 Bd6
23.Qh3 Qb8 24.Qh8+ Nf8 25.Bxf6 gxf6 26.Nxf6+ Ke7 27.Nd5+ Ke8 28.Qc3 f6 29.Qxf6
Ra7 30.e5 Be7 31.Qf4 Bd8 32.Qe3 Ne6 33.Nf6+ Bxf6 34.exf6 Kf7 35.Bd1 Nf4 36.Qd4
Ne6 37.Bb3 Qg3+ 38.Kf1 Rc7 39.Rc2 Rc4 40.Qd7+ Kxf6 41.Rf2+ Nf4 42.Qd6+ Kf5
43.Qd5+ Kf6 44.Bxc4 bxc4 45.Qxc4 Kg5 46.a4 Nd3 47.Re2 Nf4 48.Rc2 Qg4 49.Qd4 Qg3
50.Qd2 Kh5 51.Rc6 Qh4 52.Kg1 Qg4 53.Rxa6 Ne2+ 54.Kf2 Nf4 55.Ra5+ Kh4 56.Kf1 g5
57.Qe1+ Kh5 58.Qe4 Kh4 59.Re5 Qd1+ 60.Qe1+ Qxe1+ 61.Rxe1 Nd5 62.b5 g4 63.Re8
Nf6 64.Rh8+ Kg5 65.b6 1-0

The Queen’s Gambit Declined Slav variation was played and KingA wins back another game in style.

HIARCS15 Analysis:
White: 1 mistake and 3 inaccuracies.
Black: 4 mistakes and 5 inaccuracies.

Both players were about equal up until White’s move 14.fxe4 in this position:


From here, KingN played 14…Rxh2? Gains a Pawn but sacrifices position. Play continued with:
15.Rxh2 Bxh2?! A missed chance to put White into check with 15…Bg3+ causing White to lose castling rights. 16.Bg5 and White’s in a good position with both of Black’s Knights pinned and his Bishop not doing much. White can and does bring his Rook to the centre to allow advancing his Queen’s Pawn. From here it was all down hill for KingN.

Final Score 6 – 4 to KingN.

King Normal: 2 wins as White, 3 Wins as Black and 2 draws
King Alabama: 1 win as White, 2 wins as Black and 2 draws

That gives KingA an ELO rating of about 2524 in this match with a time control of 40/120

Ten games is not enough for a 100% accurate evaluation, but I think it does show that the longer time control has slightly narrowed the ELO difference from the 40/40 time control. From this small set of results I can only give my impression of how the King personalities played. My impression is that King of Alabama seemed not so good in the end game due to it’s higher selectivity possibly missing some of the nuances of the positions. TheKing Normal in the end game always increases the amount of brute force searching. That being said, when The King of Alabama found the correct line it would then play very well. The key point here is the option to turn the Auto selectivity off. I noticed, that TheKing module with Auto Selectivity turned off would still use some brute force searching but always much less than the Auto mode in the same positions. So maybe, and I stress maybe, higher selectivity does not work so well at longer time controls, and thinking when turning off the Auto Selectivity that we are losing some of the magic behind this setting.

It could be interesting to see how King of Alabama fairs with less selectivity or even set back to Auto for games at 40/120. Perhaps this personality would called King Brutus of Alabama?

I think this was a fun little tournament and by no means conclusive of the personalities performance, just possibly a hint.

Geändert von Ray (01.02.2022 um 15:34 Uhr) Grund: Missing FEN tags
Mit Zitat antworten
Folgende 7 Benutzer sagen Danke zu Ray für den nützlichen Beitrag:
Bryan Whitby (28.01.2022), Egbert (27.01.2022), Mapi (27.01.2022), marste (27.01.2022), Mephisto_Risc (27.01.2022), Oberstratege (27.01.2022), Tibono (27.01.2022)
Antwort

Themen-Optionen
Ansicht

Forumregeln
Du bist nicht berechtigt, neue Themen zu erstellen.
Du bist nicht berechtigt, auf Beiträge zu antworten.
Du bist nicht berechtigt, Anhänge hochzuladen.
Du bist nicht berechtigt, deine Beiträge zu bearbeiten.

BB code ist An
Smileys sind An.
[IMG] Code ist An.
HTML-Code ist An.

Gehe zu

Ähnliche Themen
Thema Erstellt von Forum Antworten Letzter Beitrag
Partie: Nice game by Mephisto Chess Challenger 32Mhz (tuned) Tibono Partien und Turniere / Games and Tournaments 2 14.01.2022 09:31
Partie: 10 Game Match between the Kasparov and Fischer Personalities Ray Partien und Turniere / Games and Tournaments 2 12.01.2020 13:54
Hilfe: Great Game Machine Sargon Die ganze Welt der Schachcomputer / World of chess computers 4 19.07.2012 06:46
Save Game Funktion Stefan Die ganze Welt der Schachcomputer / World of chess computers 1 27.05.2005 23:32


Alle Zeitangaben in WEZ +2. Es ist jetzt 01:55 Uhr.



Powered by vBulletin (Deutsch)
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©Schachcomputer.info