I have the following result (60min/Game):

Milano pro - Risc2500 (similar program as the Montreux) 1,5:0,5


Robert

Tournament. results for now.
T.M. Londen 5,5 out 10 games . full book
Tasc R30 2.2 5.5 out 9 ,, full book style=offensive
Risc 1 mb 5.5 out 11 ,, full book
Magellan 3 out 9 ,, full book
Montreux 8 out 12 ,, full book style=offensive
Polgar Turbo 20 mhz 1,5 out 9 ,, tournamentbook selectief 6
Milano pro 4 out 8 games tournamentbook
Rainassance SPARC 2 out 3 games tournamentbook

hier schachfreunden wieder eine partij . viel spass .greetings Hans

Hello chessfriens this is a compleet suprise for me,but against the montreux the milano pro have the same results !!

the big brother against his little one ,the magellan has to much speed for his little brother ,but the last game the milano pro played bishop g5??? (game 2)mabey because of time ore didnt the milano pro calculate so deep.... best regards Hans

hello who told us again that the Ed schröder programs didnt now how to play a endgame.........?

wieder eine schöne angreiff von die Tasc R30 ,nach Polgar laufer a4 (zug 36)gespielt hatte ,na analyse was die partie vorbei er war bessere zuge vor die polgar .. i try to learn to write german chessfriends so u may say ore improve what i write wrong beat regards Hans

I think, it would be no problem, when you write in English here; i believe, we all can read English good enough, so you don't have to learn to write in German for this community!


best regards,
Robert

a very nice attacking game from the risc ,but in the endgame the sparc could do better .best regards Hans

Hi Hans,

that's fascinating:
on my games-page (Dirk Heidtfeld) you can find nearly the same game (#10), but in move 29 the risc played 29.Rd6+ instead of 29.Qxe5, and the game ended with a draw.

Obviously even in a game between the same computers with the same time control the moves CAN vary long after the opening. Maybe we had different operating times?

best regards,
Dirk