Einzelnen Beitrag anzeigen
  #4  
Alt 24.03.2022, 15:59
Benutzerbild von applechess
applechess applechess ist offline
Lebende Foren Legende
 
Registriert seit: 18.09.2011
Ort: Kanton Zürich
Land:
Beiträge: 7.290
Abgegebene Danke: 9.885
Erhielt 15.147 Danke für 5.403 Beiträge
Aktivitäten Langlebigkeit
16/20 13/20
Heute Beiträge
3/3 sssss7290
AW: Re: Millennium Chess Classics Element

 Zitat von PMF Beitrag anzeigen
Hi Hans-Jürgen!

I greatly appreciate your reply. I’m probably not properly understanding the concept, though, so forgive my ignorance here. I was thinking that if I used the “mate in” level, then used the “move” function to make the computer do the first move here for White, it would have calculated how to reach mate from that position.

I think you may be saying that I should use the “mate in” level strictly for when the problem involves a forced mate (instead of something which has move move possibilities before you are in a forced mate position). Is that correct? If so, then for this particular setup, I should just set up the board, play that 1st move, and let the computer do its part on a normal level?

And if you can bear with me a bit further: if you do set up a lmate in” problem on the board, set White to move, then shouldn’t the computer start trying to figure out the next move for white? Or do you have to use “move” (as I did),in order to get thing started?

Hope my questions don’t seem too stupid. Just trying to better understand how all this should work as a new user of this set.

Paul
Hi Paul

You seem to misunderstand the function of the mate-level. It is explained
in the user manual as follows:

On this level, the computer searches for the quickest way to force checkmate
from the current position.
If it fails to find a forced mate in 37 ‘ply’ or less, it
displays ‘No mate found’ on the ‘Analysis’ info screen (see Section 4.4).
Note that on this level, the ‘Analysis’ screen gives no evaluation of the
position.

Kind regards
Kurt
Mit Zitat antworten