Im ersten Test da war der Mikhail Botvinnik der Berater. In diesen zeiten Test is der Alexander Kotov der Berator. Diesmal spielen die Computers Schwarz.
TEST GAME 2 - CENTRE CONTROL
A. MANGINI - A. KOTOV
MAR DEL PLATA, 1957
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Bd3 Nc6 6. c3
Ab dieser obigen Stellung faengt der Test richtig an.
Hier ist auch das gesamte Spiel mit den Punkte die man bekommen kann:
[Event "Leonard Barden Test Game 2"]
[Site "Mar del Plata, 1957"]
[Date "????.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Mangini, A.."]
[Black "Kotov, A.."]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "D06"]
[Annotator ",Microsoft"]
[PlyCount "56"]
[EventDate "1957.??.??"]
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Bd3 Nc6 6. c3 {Start Test} e5 {
3 points 6. /\ e5; 1 point 6. /\ e6; 1 point 6. /\ g6} 7. Nc2 d5 {2 points}
8. exd5 Nxd5 {1 point} 9. O-O Be6 {1 point} 10. Qf3 Bd6 {1 point} 11. Ne3 Nxe3
{2 points} 12. Bxe3 O-O {1 point} 13. Nd2 f5 {3 points} 14. Bc4 Qe7 {2 points}
15. Bxe6+ Qxe6 {1 point} 16. b4 e4 {3 points 16. /\ e4; 2 points 16. /\ Rf6}
17. Qe2 Qe5 {3 points} 18. Qc4+ Kh8 {1 point} 19. g3 Rac8 {2 points} 20. Rfd1
Qf6 {3 points} 21. Qb3 Be5 22. Nc4 f4 {
4 points 22. /\ f5; 2 points 22. /\ Bxc3} 23. Bc5 e3 {
4 points 22. /\ e3; 1 point 22. /\ Bxc3; 1 point 22. /\ Re8} 24. Bxf8 exf2+
{3 points 24. /\ exf2+; 3 points 24. /\ Rxf8} 25. Kg2 Rxf8 {
2 points 25. /\ Rxf8; -2 points 25. /\ fxg3} 26. Rd3 fxg3 {2 points} 27. Nd2
gxh2 {1 point} 28. Nf1 Qg6+ {2 points} 0-1
Beide schneiden nicht ganz so gut im 2ten Test ab.
Nach dieses Spiel da schrieb Herr Barden wie folgt:
"Readers who made a bad score in this game will probably find that they have fallen into one of two traps: either they over-pressed their attack early in the game, before Black had enough pieces developed to support his central advance, or else they were too cautious later on, underestimating the greatly advanced value of Black's pieces after the pawns were thrust forward and lines were opened for the attack."
| SKILL SET | TC 2100 | CXG 3000 |
| DEVELOPMENT | 7 FROM 23 | 4 FROM 23 |
| % FROM MAX | 30.43% | 17.39% |
| - | poor | very bad |
| POSITIONAL | 20 FROM 27 | 11 FROM 27 |
| % FROM MAX | 74.07% | 40.74% |
| - | good | average |
Key
0-20 = Very Bad
21-40% = Poor
41-60% = Average
61-80% = Good
81-90% = Very Good
91-100% = Excellent
Die Staerke in Spiele worueber es um Zentrum Kontrolle geht ist dann durchschnittlich wie folgt:
CENTRAL CONTROL RESULTS:
Saitek Travel Champion 2100
TEST 1 = 2059 ELO
TEST 2 = 1959 ELO
------------------
AVER: 2009 ELO
DEVELOPMENT: 14 FROM 45 = 31.11% = POOR (SCHLECHT)
TACTICAL: 25 FROM 28 = 89.29% = VERY GOOD
POSITIONAL: 20 FROM 27 = 74.07% = GOOD
CXG 3000
TEST 1 = 1879 ELO
TEST 2 = 1719 ELO
------------------
AVER: 1799 ELO
DEVELOPMENT: 13 FROM 45 = 28.89% = POOR (SCHLECHT)
TACTICAL: 14 FROM 28 = 50.00% = AVERAGE
POSITIONAL: 11 FROM 27 = 40.74% = AVERAGE
Beim naechsten Test handelt es sich ueber "Ueberlegene Entwicklung" (Superior Development).
Viele Gruesse,
Nick